amanico[JLC Moderator]
400987
Lecoultre Mark VII Weems. Another treasure from Jaeger Lecoultre's Patrimony.
32 mm of pure beauty and power.

Another variation, with the sterile dial, belonging to a good friend:
Highly desirable!
Best,
Nicolas

Vintage
amanico · Nov 26, 2022
Explore the Jaeger-LeCoultre Ref. 24000-42, Geophysic E 168, and Geomatic E 398. A visual journey into JLC's vintage chronometer heritage.
21 replies2634 views

Vintage
amanico · Dec 16, 2024
Explore the 'Flying Saucer' Jaeger-LeCoultre Ref. 2648. Nicolas (amanico) showcases this funky vintage JLC, a favorite among collectors for its unique design.
29 replies2854 views

Vintage
amanico · Apr 20, 2022
Explore the Jaeger-LeCoultre Ref. 24000-42, a 1970s chronometer with Caliber 906. Discover its unique design and collector insights.
26 replies5037 views
By: shoebedoe : September 18th, 2023-12:17
Any idea what it might be? The way the bezel stop is worked into the movement housing does suggest it is a genuine JLC watch (also why replace a JLC movement with another JLC in a ‚fake‘?. The case must be an original) If you don’t, do you know anyone who...
By: shoebedoe : September 18th, 2023-12:53
You are right in that it is another example of a ‚square‘ movement in a round watch by JLC but this is a double date with a non hacking calibre 412 and is also used in the square cases double date. The Weems i uploaded has a hacking movement likely to be ...
All fake...
By: Ilja : September 19th, 2023-11:49
Locking crown position is wrong, 2 o'clock instead of 4 o'clock. Dial is wrong, the triangle makers on each hour position are plain rectangular, Distance from numbers to scale circle is too far. Would like to see case back from both sides...
By: shoebedoe : September 19th, 2023-12:52
you may be right but I still wonder why someone replaces an original movement with an original JLC movement in a fake? doesn,t make sense to me. Here more images of the back, equally not promising for authenticity. ...
weird assembly indeed
By: Clavi : September 19th, 2023-13:02
To add to the list of 7 errors, it looks like the case is smaller than a mkVII. The bezel (which looks somewhat right) protrudes too much over the side of the case. It would catch clothes or objects and would instantly pop-off in actual military use... Yo...