amanico
[JLC Moderator]
373460
Interesting point. I never thought about that detail. Maybe because it is not the only watch to display a moon phase without date? [nt]
No message body
Not sure why this model wasn't really popular.
For me, however, it was my first real purchase into this crazy hobby. From time to time, I have thought about moving on from this piece but I haven't let it go for that sentimental reason. ...
If it does have a date function, then I think its worth it. My opinion. 😎
Cause you could synchronizer the date with the moon phase. Tfs. 👍 Geross
In the Patek line up of models Calatrava for ladies they have one also with no date. To me it's a no no. Would not aspire to own one. 😂 [nt]
For my wife or daughter. No way Nico. Cheers 🍻, keep safe my friend. Geross
I have owned that Model twice now ..
and I find it absolutely beautiful. It is definitely a bit chunky so you probably need a larger wrist. That wasn't a problem for me but so being a bit OCD it was hard to tell the time exactly so much of the time because of the disks. Nevertheless, given t...
I cannot speak for others.
But for me it was its thickness that made me pass on it. Had it been 1-2mm thinner then maybe a Reverso Grande Date or Sun Moon would have been my first Reverso. The movement is especially nice in these. And yours with the stars on it stands out a even a ...
I also do not understand why the Reverso Grande Sun/Moon is not more popular and IMHO underappreciated...
As others have stated, it could have been the size or thickness but I find it wears well, even with my small wrist (16.5 cm - 16.75cm). Along with the Reverso Grande GMT, the Reverso Grande Sun/Moon is a watch I have not worn in a long time which will nee...
