Chromatic Fugue
1847
I agree
Nov 04, 2019,08:18 AM
I posted photos of that one on my wrist a few weeks ago, and Nicolas wisely encouraged me to look for the smaller 85th Anniversary model. The one you show here is definitely more substantial. Youโll definitely want to try it on, though; I think itโs thicker as well as taller/wider, and not everyone has a flat wrist that contours well with these.
Comments:
view entire thread
Awesome shots!!
By: Watcholic_id : November 2nd, 2019-21:02
The first pic really shows the beauty of the dial, love it ๐๐พ๐๐พ
Thank you Nicolas
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 3rd, 2019-17:48
Of course, I owe the choice to you!
So true...
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 3rd, 2019-17:49
I buy watches largely on the basis of how the macro lens will treat them. And this one does not disappoint.
thanks!
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 3rd, 2019-17:53
This is the Reverso Tribute Duo 85th Anniversary, Ref. No. Q3908420.
I knew someone would ask ...
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 3rd, 2019-17:59
The watch looks as substantial as it does in the wristshot only because I have a thin wrist -- about 6 inches. The dimensions of this watch are essentially the same as those of the "Grande Taille," which ironically means "large size." It's not large at al...
Thanks...
By: India Whiskey Charlie : November 4th, 2019-08:12
So, for someone who has a 7.25" wrist, the newer Blue Tribute Duoface model might fit better: ...
I agree
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 4th, 2019-08:18
I posted photos of that one on my wrist a few weeks ago, and Nicolas wisely encouraged me to look for the smaller 85th Anniversary model. The one you show here is definitely more substantial. Youโll definitely want to try it on, though; I think itโs thick...
Thanks...
By: Chromatic Fugue : November 3rd, 2019-18:00
I would tell you that I bought the suit to match the watch, because that would be fun if true, but alas it is not. : )