Clavi
788
A very valid point
I agree with you that this lack of lume in the index is a functionnal (and hitoric consistency) problem.
However, if you are frustrated by the lack of lume in the indexes of the '68, you should be equally frustrated by the lack of lume in the '65 reedition, as this clearly should have had luminous indexes too
(as per Marv posted 1965 catalog in the roll call thread, reproduced below)
A very valid point
By: Clavi : May 17th, 2009-22:56
I agree with you that this lack of lume in the index is a functionnal (and hitoric consistency) problem. However, if you are frustrated by the lack of lume in the indexes of the '68, you should be equally frustrated by the lack of lume in the '65 reeditio...
Hi, Kronos
By: amanico : May 18th, 2009-04:29
Yes, you're right, the first dials came with a letter from JLC allowing a future change of the dial, till Dec 2009. It is not possible to do the same with the new dial, I mean going from the new to the former one. AFAIK, there won't be another dial, and t...
Polaris dial
By: moonway : May 18th, 2009-16:54
I have the same complaint so I emailed the client services director on the North American JLC website last week...she forwarded my complaint to the Technical Director and asked me to call him...but I haven't had the opportunity to do so. I wonder what the...