amanico
[JLC Moderator]
404118
Well said, LVT
I agree with you about bad comments, which are constructive when they are elaborated.
This can't be only " I love " , or " I don't love ", this is not that simple, or this doesn't have to be.
Here, we are not perfect ( at least, me ), but we try our best to share this commmon Passion.
We agree or disagree, it doesn't matter, finally.
Best,
Nicolas
Why no IWC forum?
Forgive the impertinence as a "newbie" so to speak, but it stands to reason that the majority of members here probably own an IWC...so why no forum? Thanks in advance, Young
Here are several past threads on why no IWC Forum here
here are a couple past threads: click here click here click here Cheers, Anthony
Goes to show how much interest there is, Anthony...
... maybe it's time to lobby with Georges Kern to reverse the decision? Incidentally, I quoted from memory above but here's the literal quote: '[T]he "IWC" forum does not exist because IWC has asked us not to. 'They feel they currently have enough "covera...
Doable, Jos, but not easy, as you perfectly said
Each forum provides to his moderator a lot of work. If the brand doesn't want to play the game, I don't see why we would invest our time. It's sad for IWC Lovers, I agree, but this is the situation...For now. Best, Nicolas
I appreciate ThePurist forum more than IWC
In this forum , I gain many thing : knownledge , vision , inspiration...I think good watch brand should be happy to present themself on this forum . Sometime, they are not happy with bad comment which we speake here , but in fact the bad comment will help...
Simple. We love IWC too much, we only have forums for brands we hate so we can speak ill..
For example we have Journe so we can speculate about the stock ETA gear train he uses, or Lange so we can whisper about JLC making its parts, or Omega so we can carp about its parts made in China. - SJX
