logan2z
915
Probably where most criticism will come from?
That's been the bulk of the talk on the Hodinkee Instagram feed since the watch was announced. While it's true that IWC has a history of using ebauches, I think most people took exception to the price given that the watch uses an essentially off the shelf Sellita SW300 - ok, IWC assembled it and maybe tuned it a bit, but it doesn't sound like they really did much of any significance, or you can be sure they would have talked it up 
Besides the cost of the watch, IWC just made much of the fact that they were moving away from third-party movements to their own in-house movements in their pilot watches. This was greatly ballyhooed at the recent SIHH. To then release a limited edition pilot with a Sellita movement and a hefty price tag rubbed people the wrong way. Couple that to the fact that the new Spitfire line all have new in-house movements at much lower prices than the LE (the Spitfire chronograph, for example, has an in-house movement and is $5700, compared to $6400 for the three-handed LE) and you have a bit of an uproar. Yes, the Spitfires are steel rather than Ceratanium but I suspect the Hodinkee tax has more to do with the premium than the case material.
All of this said, I do like the watch and the fact that it has a simple, no-date dial that suits this type of watch very well. If IWC releases a version with a steel case and an in-house movement (surely they can remove the date from one of their new in-house movements and the setting position from the crown - Stowa does this on it's $1K pilot watches), then I'd be a buyer.
FYI, the watch is sold out in the Hodinkee shop but pieces are also apparently being made available through select boutiques worldwide. So it may still be possible to get one if one is so inclined.
This is the Year of the IWC Pilot Watch Collaboration
First in January at the SIHH we had the IWC x Rake x Revolution collaboration: "The IWC Pilot's Watch Automatic 36mm Special Edition for the Rake and Revolution" an LE of 150 pieces. ( Click Here ) And released earlier this week is the IWC x Hodinkee coll...
My IWC mk xv is quite accurate at 38mm it fits just right on my wrist.
And the lumes just right. At 36mm I think it's great. Thanks for sharing. Cool watch and post Reintitan. š Cheers š» ...
Agree regarding the case
The technology sounds interesting and the light weight is nice. But it wouldn't be too heavy in steel. I also think $6,400 is a bit steep, especially with the Selitta movement. Those criticisms aside, it is a handsome watch!
I've been hoping for this...
throwback design for the Mark series. I wish IWC would release a steel version with these exact specs but mass produce them and drop the price to where it should be - around $3.5K-ish? 38mm would be even cooler and they can even throw the Mark XIX text on...
It's a possibility that they do just that
Since George Kern is gone, no-date watches are again possible at IWC!
It's not PVD or any coating, the zirconium oxide in the alloy transforms into ceramic when heated to a certain temperature and it turns black in color.
Here's their description: p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px 'Helvetica Neue'} "CerataniumĀ® starts as a unique titanium alloy that contains zirconium oxide, which is then cut and milled into finished watch components ā after theyāre shape...
I agree that it's nice to see both of these references.
I'm not the premium for the Hodinkee watch is really that unreasonable given the different case material (and perhaps the pricing power Hodinkee may bring).
Price aside....movement aside....
It is a bloody COOL watch ā period. I canāt remember when was the last time I was that excited over IWCās Pilot watches. The revolution version is quite interesting, but I reckon this one is 10/10 for aesthetics. ...
Probably where most criticism will come from?
That's been the bulk of the talk on the Hodinkee Instagram feed since the watch was announced. While it's true that IWC has a history of using ebauches, I think most people took exception to the price given that the watch uses an essentially off the shelf...
Not getting the inhouse movement for both collaboration watches may have been the "price"
or compromise they had to make to get the project green-lighted by Richemont me thinks. IWC wanted their own non-cobranded watches first with them. But who knows. I've seen the replies on Hodinkee's IG about the movement. Makes me laugh a little. When did...
Some of the blame lies with the manufacturers
Brands like Panerai and IWC have been moving all of their watches to in-house movements so they're setting certain expectations. And when the in-house models are less expensive than the models with third party movements then buyers question the value of t...
Maybe Hodinkee has been paying attention to the auctions...
I don't know what their cost was to source the case material as well as manufacture them in a limited quantity but in regards to the movement, yes, the $6K+ price tag is quite high. However, they may have noticed how some of their LE pieces have been perf...
I think the comparison is a bit unfair..the new material makes a big difference. The new ceramic Mark is priced the same
and is "just" ceramic. The watch is very light ..of course the movement it is what it is but not a big concern to me ..of course I am biased I just found incredible how people disregarded the case material in their IG fights
I like this iteration a lot, the black ceramic case is cool. But its another rehash of the original after Mark 12, Portofino 351 and last years Tribute 3270-07 . And that price ????
full retail for a website portal that already cashes on advertsā¦ i dont get it. Not mine but from the net ...