flowtr
228
Oh no! I just sold an IWC a couple of weeks ago!
If I only had seen this article earlier, I could instead have sold a Patek which I now understand has a lower Luxury Brand Status Index (LBSI - patent pending). What is the point of owning luxury brand items if they don't raise your LBSI? I bet the neighbors must be laughing. Anyone knows how Prada sneakers rate? Can I continue to drink Dom Perignon out of Christofle? Where can I find more reports about how weathy Americans think???
Nonsense
By: Park : April 16th, 2009-20:29
IWC is a fine brand, but the "LBSI" has never been correct about anything. Their poorly designed survey and absurd definition of wealth (almost as silly as but much less costly than the Obama definitiion) produces obviously stupid and wrongheaded results ...
Not "Mainly"
By: aaronm : April 17th, 2009-09:28
They have been increasing the number of inhouse movements, especially in the precious-metals cases, but they still rely on commodity movements for much of their product line. Many of them are tweeked/refinished quite well, and some of them are used as bas...
This is BS
By: Bruno.M1 : April 17th, 2009-08:49
IWC is a good brand but putting them above VC, Patek, AP, .... AND A LOT OF OTHERS !! ... is a big joke. I don't know who counts the votes or whoe were the people who voted but they are defenitely NO WIS !