toxly347
594
This
I am cautious to express an opinion here, as both look very good, but to put it in the late George Daniels’ words, there is less trace of the LM101 movement having being “made”, in fact hardly any trace at all, and the end result is that it looks more as if it has been “created”. Some of us would wish for something like this to be said about our work.
Fantastic pictures!
I like the deep more dramatic anglage on the perpetual, however, the 101 has a nice neat and sharp presentation as well. Fine watches 👍
The LM101 seems better finished
The difference is quite marked based on the images. The finish ( chamfering) on LM Perpetual seems more industrial than the artisanal finish of LM101. The gear teeth also seem better finished similarly on LM101.
This
I am cautious to express an opinion here, as both look very good, but to put it in the late George Daniels’ words, there is less trace of the LM101 movement having being “made”, in fact hardly any trace at all, and the end result is that it looks more as ...
Interesting point
To my novice eyes the anglage on the perpetual resembles how Dufour does his in deep and broad fashion. It's nice to see both approaches!
True
The anglage is definitely deeper in the perpetual, and I think both movements look great. However, to my also novice eyes the polishing in the grooves of the wheels on the LM101 looks perfect, and although the anglage is definitely less wide, the overall ...
The magnification and angle skews things towards the perpetual.
We’ll just have to take your word for it, that they are equally-finished.
Sublime or sublimissime…? Both of course are 😍😍
However my heart goes to Kari’s LM101 if I had to choose only one 😉, but why choosing both are 🤪
