sham1
9768
Thank you for your reply!
I think having the RW Smith Series 1 is a certainty. I ordered the watch in November 2016 and I know this is the type of watch that will give me tons of pleasure. If I had to fault the Series 1, it would be its height of 13.5mm. Here I was trying on a 12.2mm Balancier Conemporain and I found it a bit bulky compared to the 11.7mm high Signature 1. I know of a fellow purist who also tried on the Signature 1 and found that to be bulky next to his 10.9mm high Reverso moonphase which I felt was buiky. The point here is that this is all very relative and subjective and I do hope that the height of the Series 1 will not be off putting in any way. Whether or not I add a Signature 1 to my collection is the million dollar question. I am seldom these days impressed by a watch as many in my opinion seem generic with nothing new to add. I have since discovered that the Signature 1 is accurate to -1 +2 seconds daily. This for me is mighty impressive and as I said, I am seldom impressed. I knew GFs were accurate and have won many chronometric awards but I believe only the most accurate Pateks (the 5101 with a tourbillon and the Aquanaut travel time Advanced Research 5650G) can hope to compete.
Greubel versus Greubel!
Earlier today, I decided to head down to my local AD as I knew they had two of the most wearable and most affordable Greubel Forsey watches ever made. The Signature 1 in stainless steel measures 41.4mm in diameter and 11.7mm in height while the more recen...
Those GF’s are fantastic!
But that Series 1 😍😍😍😍 is just amazing! All the best, Niall
I am still deliberating on the Signature 1
but shall wait for the 2021 novelties to appear first.
It would be a good choice,
But if GF are working on some new editions at the moment, it could be prudent to wait a little bit and see what they release.
Wait
I definitely will. I am not just waiting for GF's new releases but also that of all the brands. A Patek 5231G would melt me!
Thank you for your feedback!
Yes I agree. Classic will still be attractive for many years to come. Boring maybe for some but attractive!
Believe it or not, both look very good on your wrist
But between these two and the Series 1, completely in agreement that the Series 1 would triumph. Somehow, that classic and the immaculate detail on both the dial and the movement makes it a very special, and even outstanding one.
Thanks Richard!
You are such a diplomat and I would dead broke by now if I had bought everything you like on my wrist!!
Legibility
When a watch have lose it’s primair function tell the time, and become a art object it is for me also thinking the essence such a watch can fill in. Owning such a watch i know it. On the wrist is feels like art instead of a wearable watch. When collecting...
Thanks for your feedback!
I would love a Daniels and wish I had bought one when they were still affordable.
No
I saw a Hodinkee video, and the Daniels owner talked about his Daniels. (talking watches) In that episode they talked about the Citizen of his father, the Daniels. They talked about the magic of watches and how watches influence architecture. The Daniels ...
You may be referring to the Daniels Anniversary Watch
I actually tried it on courtesy of A Collected Man in 2016 and it was too large for my wrist at 40mm and the lugs as you can did not curve. Quite a nice watch but too yellow for me. And for the record, Roger Smith made every single one of these Anniversar...
The watch
sham, you post the watch we bespoke. Indeed a very yellow watch, eye candy.
Actually that Anniversary watch
was not bespoke. It was produced in 43 pieces, 35 in yellow gold and 4 in white gold and 4 in platinum.
All hand made by Roger Smith
even though it bears the Daniels name as George passed away in 2011 before the watches went into production but he did have a hand in the design input. Roger would have made the watches using the Daniels method.
Insightful review
I like to read what other watch-lovers think and feel when they try a new watch on and the resulting feelings and feedback. That Roger Smith is hard to compete with, I'd say it belongs more to the Voutilainen and Dufour league IMHO, just because of the di...
I have tried on a Romain Gauthier
but I am not too keen on the winding crown on the HMS and HMS Prestige range (now discontinued I believe) which is actually located at the back of the watch. Immaculately finished but winding a watch is pretty much a daily blissful affair for me and it sh...
I think that is the general consensus.
Thanks for replying. The GFs are great but RW Smith is at a different level.
Excellent comparison my friend ,
These two are definitely the most wearable GFs out today. I love them both and was lucky to try them on my wrist back when we still had events 😏. I would be very very happy to own one of them at some point, think i would opt for the BC although the S1 doe...
Thanks my friend for your feedback!
I hope you will get a chance to try on a RW Smith or else you will have to settle with trying on my Series 1! And yes I agree that the Signature 1 is more GF in its dial design even if it is missing a tourbillon or two!
Thanks for the nice review Sham! That's the danger of seeing a new watch -- there's always a chance we may unexpectedly fall in love with it and be unable to forget it! ;-)
I think it's impossible to compare your upcoming RWS with this GF...very different beasts, but both at the very top of their league among independent watchmakers ;-) A two watch collection? In principle, why not... If you like this GF and think you can we...
I cannot fathom
not having a Patek in my small collection. At present I have one and I am likely to end up with two. Yes a GF and a RW Smith would be quite a two watch collection and at least, I would never under use either watch I am sure. But I am curious if any purist...
Normally when deciding on a watch
I will ask myself what other watches can I buy for the money. In this price range, one could argue that the FPJ Chronometre Resonance is a great watch. So too is the Charles Frodsham or any Voutilainen. But in this particular instance due to its high end ...
Having gotten to know a little bit of your taste in watches...
it feels quite strange to see such avant garde watches on your wrist Sham Of the two I would say the Signature 1 is the more subdued piece. It looks great on your wrist even though it is on the larger side. I am a bit partial to the Balancier Contemporain...
Thanks Rahul!
Having an avant garde watch on my wrist is one thing, buying it is quite another although while typing this, I am also whatsapping Sincere Singapore to find out the price and availability there! All I can say is that the Signature 1 is a lot more wearable...
It would be my pleasure Rahul
And I would love to see some of the goodies you own too
I prefer the Signature over the other two -
just don't enjoy the classic/retro dial design of the Roger Smith - and would prefer it over almost any other watch! Not to mention that it looks great on your wrist. Thank you for sharing. Wonderful problems to ponder, and resolve. Cheers Marc
Finally
one vote for the Signature 1. Thanks Marc. It is a lovely watch but beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. The classic look of the RW Smith is likely to stand the test of time better than the Greubel Forsey but such considerations are seldom taken into ac...
Oh, you'd better, absolutely, with that kind of investment.
Very easy for me to say in my book classic/retro does not equal timeless when there is nothing at all at stake for me. However, as others have written here, these three are all excellent choices/challenges, and the Roger Smith has of course a good claim t...
Thank you for your reply!
I think having the RW Smith Series 1 is a certainty. I ordered the watch in November 2016 and I know this is the type of watch that will give me tons of pleasure. If I had to fault the Series 1, it would be its height of 13.5mm. Here I was trying on a 12....
I very much appreciate how much thought
you are putting into this. It's a great pleasure for me to follow your approach and deliberation. I'm sure handling all or any of these watches, which I haven't been lucky enough to, would compete. Anyway, I'm quite sure you will derive a lot of joy from ...
Thanks Marc!
Nope it will not be a million dollar question literally but when one has retired with zero income, every watch purchase feels like a million dollar question!
wonderful GF!
I also have small wrist size...these would be the only options for me as well
And either
would make a wonderful addition to your world class collection! I really wish I had your photography skills when the photos were taken yesterday!
I think if there was a vote for best photos taken in this forum
you would easily make the top 3 if not win top spot. If I had your skills, I would come out of retirement and become a professional photographer. At least then, I can buy more watches!!
Amazing to see both of these more wearable GFs!
Definitely consider adding one! Along with the Smith, Gronefeld, and Grossmann, you would have a very diverse collection of elite pieces, all from different countries and with different movement finishing styles!
I wish I could keep all the aforementioned watches
but I think I shall have to let the Gronefeld go to finance the Smith. The Grossmann is of course a keeper. The Signature 1 would be a wonderful addition but as I am a bit worried about the resale values of GFs, I am trying to negotiate on the best possib...
I think GFs are always going to be highly desirable, many consider them the pinnacle of the independents.
I don't think I've ever seen a GF trading pre-owned for low amounts either. But they do price their new watches aggressively, so perhaps the depreciation is still large. A shame to hear about the Gronefeld, but the sacrifice will be worth it I'm sure
I have tried to juggle the figures many times
and I wish I could keep the Remontoire but it is not possible. Also, I am focusing on simple time only watches as I believe the more complex watches have a higher probability of malfunctioning and therefore be more expensive to maintain. So out went my Pa...