The recent references to the central tourbillons made me think: w hy don’t we see more central tourbillons? Beat Haldimann’s hand built H1 and Omega’s variants come to mind, but are there others? Are they more difficult to build than ‘traditional’ tourbil...
There is far more to the H1 than a central tourbillon. The aesthetics of this watch are beyond any I've ever worn, and the sound has a tick/tock clarity I've never heard before. Both history and artistry in a single piece. I rarely use the word 'masterpie...
And another observation - I generally dislike onion crowns, but on the Haldimann's it just works. In fact I can't think of any other watch I like them on. Andrew
At least in these photos they appear truncated - or less onionated - than those on a Maurice Lacroix a Chronoswiss. The old ML Flyback, that I once owned also gave no tactile pleasure while trying to grip the crown for a full wind. I don't know of any hig...
"Only a churl such as myself would wonder about their time-keeping properties, the raison d'etre of a tourbillon - wherever it is placed." The time-keeping properties of the H-1 is not a problem at all, thank you very much...from multiple and extended (ma...
check out the Dec issue of iW magazine (US edition) - it has some very good articles on the Tourbillon. Also many past discussions here on PuristSPro. Cheers, TM
Hi AndrewD , I know your thread is about central tourbillons and I really like the looks of the haldimann1 central tourbillon but have not seen one close up or handled one ( not represented in OZ ?) , but just digressing a bit, I have handled and tried on...
...but very few central, co-axial tourbillons. The UN Freak - some argument about whether that is a tourbillon at all. I remember reading one argument that it was in fact a Karussel. Possibly it's neither. Here's a central, non-coaxial tourby from Cartier...
for me, I would not consider the Astrotourbi from Cartier a central tourbi nor would I the Diavolo or the Relatiff. All fantastic pieces though of course.