WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

wow, lengthy scholarly post

 

I think we are discussing value in a very indirect way almost everyday on this forums, with advertisements, like the incessant Linde Werdelin one on the right of this screen, to the "reviews" given by fellow purists on watches, such as the recent GG Bulgari Sapphire Tourbillion. It is about making unique value-propositions, on why this watch should receive our favour, over another, and this goes on and on.

I may be dangerously over-generalising an idea, but I feel that most Purists gather here to garner as much horological knowledge as possible to ground their next logical purchase. It is wisdom that is the pinnacle of what we strive for, which some clearly have after years of experience- think BernardCheong and Armanico. Price as I would see, would be a raw data, and what we really need to do is to translate that data into wisdom- how valuable the piece is.

Retrieved from: weknowmore.org g

In short, I guess few would dare to say: "this one's a keeper, or this one is lousy" on this forum, based on their logical value assessments. History has told us that the most unpopular pieces then, can end up being the best pieces to have. For example, the Orange hand Explorer, snow flake submariner. Value is such a tough topic to discuss, but I see trickles of interesting value propositions that may prove to be wise advise on this forum, in an indirect manner.

my 2 cents of nonsense

  login to reply
💰42 Marketplace Listings for Bvlgari