The Sub for sure! [nt]

Sep 18, 2011,17:02 PM
 

No message body

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

New "This or That"

 
 By: db darien : September 18th, 2011-09:59
Which?...  

The Sub.

 
 By: amanico : September 18th, 2011-10:07
At least it is a true Rolex, while this VC is a strange attempt from the brand in the Sports watch world... It sounds tough, but it is my opinion. I don't see it as a true VC, while this Rolex is a true one. Best, Nicolas.

Sub definately...

 
 By: Andy : September 18th, 2011-10:10
if they did a new sub with a red 'Submariner' writing I'd be first on the list. It's a classic and does exactly what it says on the tin...in the flesh it is stunning too. Just my opinion of course. Andy.

What is your current state of collection ? [nt]

 
 By: foversta : September 18th, 2011-10:20
No message body

These...among others.....

 
 By: db darien : September 18th, 2011-11:19
...  

Ok...

 
 By: foversta : September 18th, 2011-11:36
I would suggest to go to a Chronograph but the Vacheron is far from being my fav one. The Sub is a classic so I would choose the Rolex. But keep in mind the idea of the chronograph! Fx

No question the Sub. [nt]

 
 By: grigo : September 18th, 2011-10:26
No message body

Sub all day everyday...at least this case... [nt]

 
 By: ocwatching : September 18th, 2011-11:01
No message body

You already have a sports UTS

 
 By: Hororgasm : September 18th, 2011-11:52
And to be frank, the Sub and the VC are quite different. The VC is more like sports elegance whilst the Sub is more akin to a true sports rugged watch, which you already have in the form of the UTS. So if it HAS TO BE ONE OF THE TWO, I say the VC, which h... 

The Sub for sure! [nt]

 
 By: i_am_Sam : September 18th, 2011-17:02
No message body

VC but not this one...

 
 By: sidneyc : September 18th, 2011-18:27
... how about an Overseas Chrono? I had this exact Royal Eagle before and I love it to bits. The build quality blew me away. However, it is a discontinued model now, and I believe VC have improved things a lot in the newer Overseas Chrono.

That gets my vote.

 
 By: aaronm : September 18th, 2011-18:38
I've never been the biggest fan of the RE, but a nice semi-sporty watch like an overseas or a AP Royal oak (not offshore) might fit well into the collection, even a Breguet type XX or XXI A

VC is more Unique.........nt

 
 By: Tony A.H : September 18th, 2011-19:52
T

Sub for me! [nt]

 
 By: BluNotte : September 18th, 2011-20:37
More "Pure" if i may say! But either way, not a mistake! Ciao Stephen This message has been edited by BluNotte on 2011-09-18 20:38:19

you already have a chronograph..

 
 By: KC74 : September 18th, 2011-20:41
..if you really want a chronograph, what you can do is instead of spending all on the VC chronograph, get yourself an Omega Speedie (can be used), and you MUST buy the Submariner at the same time. Everyone needs a Sub in their collection whether you like ... 

Rolex for me.

 
 By: VMM : September 19th, 2011-04:49
Not a fan of the Royal Eagle. Nor of the cyclops, so I would go Sea Dweller or no date Sub. Cheers, Vte

My vote's for the VC...

 
 By: Emil Wojcik : September 19th, 2011-07:59
...although I'd prefer an Overseas. Subs are common. It seems like I see them every day. Not that there's anything wrong with that...they are great watches and I wish I still had mine...but I'd still choose the VC.

VC definitely ...

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : September 19th, 2011-08:56
NOT! This is just my 2HRK and I'm not trying to insult anyone or persuade anyone but I can't understand how and why they put VC insignia on dial... the most absurd part is HRS. & MIN. writing on subdials It look's like they made it for complete watch newc...  

" All the President men ". You killed a legend, but you're right.

 
 By: amanico : September 19th, 2011-11:29
A lot of people thought that Robert wore a 1675, it is a 5513. And I was among them, till recently. Best, my friend. Nicolas.

Tough Crowd..... [nt]

 
 By: db darien : September 19th, 2011-12:10
No message body

Redford IS left-handed..... [nt]

 
 By: tee530 : September 20th, 2011-12:26
No message body

Sub please. [nt]

 
 By: joeyza : September 19th, 2011-16:52
No message body