BDLJ
4653
The JLC impact test.
The JLC test would appear to far exceed the ISO Standard.
When you drop a watch from 1 metre, it'll hit that hardwood board at 4.43m/s, which is where JLC set their test. The difference is....they use a huge 3kg mass...or 30 times worse than say a 100gram watch. Or like dropping the same 100gram watch from 30m instead of 1m.
So either JLC are exceptionally good, or the standard is exceptionally poor!
(whoops, just followed your links. Velociphile did the same maths...)
Shock resistance testing
By: AndrewD : October 3rd, 2010-14:49
Hi All, Tom’s early Incabloc advertisements prompted me to read about shock resistance testing of watches and I thought you might be interested in the information too. ISO 1413:1984 is the common standard employed, but is relatively easy to achieve with m...
The JLC impact test.
By: BDLJ : October 3rd, 2010-20:42
The JLC test would appear to far exceed the ISO Standard. When you drop a watch from 1 metre, it'll hit that hardwood board at 4.43m/s, which is where JLC set their test. The difference is....they use a huge 3kg mass...or 30 times worse than say a 100gram...
A few years back
By: docsnov : October 6th, 2010-14:45
I removed a watch from a dog's small intestine. As I had not been bitten by the bug, I am not sure what brand it was although I want to say it was a Casio. I don't think it was rated as resistant to stomach acid and digestive juices. The owner did not wan...
Fantastic radiograph
By: docsnov : October 7th, 2010-22:20
The following discussion was very entertaining as well. I am unfortunately aware of foreign bodies in the colon due to voluntary placement of objects, but seeing an ingested watch is a little suprising. I have heard of people swallowing drugs or precious ...