AndrewD[HoMe Moderator]
12829
Shock resistance testing
Hi All,
Tom’s early Incabloc advertisements prompted me to read about shock resistance testing of watches and I thought you might be interested in the information too. ISO 1413:1984 is the common standard employed, but is relatively easy to achieve with modern watch design.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) document “ISO 1413:1984 Horology, Shock-resistant watches” describes the method of testing and specifies the minimum requirements that a watch must achieve in order to be described as shock resistant. Some of the watches that pass this test have “Shock Resistant” engraved on the watch. I assume “Shock Proof” is some literary licence taken by the manufacturers and obviously overstates the truth.
The test is based on the simulation of the shock received by a watch falling from a height of 1 m on to a horizontal hardwood surface.
In practice this is achieved by applying two shocks, one on the 9 o'clock side, and one perpendicular to the front of the watch on the crystal. The shock is delivered by a hard plastic hammer weighing 3 Kg mounted on a pendulum delivering an impact velocity of 4.43 m/s. The watch must be able to maintain its accuracy to +/- 60 seconds/day as measured before the test.
Attached are some photos from a 2004 PuristS tour of the JLC Manufacture. The link is provided for some interesting discussion on the forces involved .
Regards
Andrew
Shock resistance testing
By: AndrewD : October 3rd, 2010-14:49
Hi All, Tom’s early Incabloc advertisements prompted me to read about shock resistance testing of watches and I thought you might be interested in the information too. ISO 1413:1984 is the common standard employed, but is relatively easy to achieve with m...
The JLC impact test.
By: BDLJ : October 3rd, 2010-20:42
The JLC test would appear to far exceed the ISO Standard. When you drop a watch from 1 metre, it'll hit that hardwood board at 4.43m/s, which is where JLC set their test. The difference is....they use a huge 3kg mass...or 30 times worse than say a 100gram...
A few years back
By: docsnov : October 6th, 2010-14:45
I removed a watch from a dog's small intestine. As I had not been bitten by the bug, I am not sure what brand it was although I want to say it was a Casio. I don't think it was rated as resistant to stomach acid and digestive juices. The owner did not wan...
Fantastic radiograph
By: docsnov : October 7th, 2010-22:20
The following discussion was very entertaining as well. I am unfortunately aware of foreign bodies in the colon due to voluntary placement of objects, but seeing an ingested watch is a little suprising. I have heard of people swallowing drugs or precious ...