Topcat30093
3482
Thanks to everyone for your thoughts..............
Tom, out of the examples that you gave, for me it would be the latter, though I don't fall over through tooooooooo much drink these days, although a week on Thursday maybe different!!!!!!
I tend to agree with about Rolex & Seiko, although I am certain that there are many, many other brands that would meet their robustness.
That's a large topic.
By: mkvc : July 4th, 2010-23:45
I have a few thoughts on "robustness." First, some watches are designed to tighter tolerances than others. Those that can work with fairly loose tolerances will be able to take more abuse than those that depend on everything's being "just right." Certain ...
A few more thoughts...
By: tee530 : July 5th, 2010-20:02
Robustness covers a couple of different features, not all completely correlated. For example: Robustness could be resistance to serious damage caused by severe impact (dropping, etc). Shock-mounted movement; thick, deforming case, and large caliber would ...
from the depths
By: amerix : July 15th, 2010-14:39
As a reply to " have no concerns in say wearing a chronograph, while out running, but would it be a wise to wear a perpetual calendar performing the same activity?" I remember these lines from a "vaudeville" show, the lowest class of caberet entertainment...