only5402
507
of course it is the aesthetic faithfulness to the original vintage and ...
... both watches (806 and 765 - the re-editions) are in this categorie, but i personally wouldn't pay
the price for the 806 re-edition, when it is possible to buy a vintage one for a bid more - i would
buy the original vintage
if i would think about buying the 765 re-edition, i know, that the original vintage one would have
a much higher price - so for me the 765 re-edition in this case is a more attractive alternative to think about
regards
Stephan
best re-edition, a good re-edition - it depends on different aspects ...
so this one is a good example there also is the 806 re-edition 1959 both are good made re-editions, but there also is the aspect of the price in relation to the original vintage one for me the 806 the original vintage one is the better choice for the mone...
Are you saying that a good vs best re-edition is dependent on the value of the actual vintage compared to the “tribute”?
I personally think it is the aesthetic faithfulness to the original vintage
of course it is the aesthetic faithfulness to the original vintage and ...
... both watches (806 and 765 - the re-editions) are in this categorie, but i personally wouldn't pay the price for the 806 re-edition, when it is possible to buy a vintage one for a bid more - i would buy the original vintage if i would think about buyin...
I see your point, but I think it is more accurate to say that you are referring to perceived value of a tribute relative to its original vintage, and its obtainability relative to the original.
I also offer another perspective. A lot of us own the original vintage, sometimes in mint condition, but due to their "fragility" and/or actual monetary worth, I wear the tributes as a daily wearers.
