Divers(e)
After years of little interest in the genre I have (relatively) recently gotten into divers. Here's what I realized I like about them: 1. They want you to go out and have a good time! They are not the kind of watches that you need to protect from mess or ...
Let's put it this way.
The elephant in the room is the ubiquitous Submariner and you don't have it (at least in the photo ). Fact is: I owned four ot them and all got sold sooner or later (same happened for the Pelagos BTW). What are you missing? High horology divers, like Breg...
I've actually never owned a Sub!
I've been SERIOUSLY considering a vintage Sea-Dweller, though. As for the high horology divers, I came very close to going for an AP Offshore Diver last year, but you know what held me back? The IWC! Lighter, tougher, way more comfortable on my wrist and ...
Triple 6 it should be, then :-)
On the modern side, the SD 4000 is the best "Submariner" that Rolex produced in the past decade or so. Speaking of BP, the Fifty Fathoms to me is the epitome of what a brand should never do. Too many limited editions with nice specs and the standard colle...
Nice line-up Ian! 👍🏻
I’ve always been into divers for the same reasons as you. My divers are Sub 40 mm no date, Black Bay 58 blue and most recently added, SM300 Heritage blue. GO Sea Q blue (regular date not pano) was a close second. But the charm of the Omega won me over thi...
Thanks Jesse!
I notice that all three of yours are steel and the sort of watches that one can easily dress up a little bit. The Panerai is my only diver like that, which has made it my go-to only watch for beachy travel. Example photo from last winter: ...
I love divers...
...for exactly the same reasons that you mention. They are just fun to wear and you have a very diverse and great selection.
And most important (for me):
The rotating bezel permits convenient measurements of the elapsed time - or offers an easy to read time marker. Marcus
Yes!
The Tudor, with its bidirectional bezel, is the best of the group for that function. The IWC is the worst: as a right-wrist watch wearer I pretty much have to remove the watch to turn the bezel.
Fully agree! Watches with an internal dive ring may look neat ...
... but technically are the worst option: You get another hole in the case with a potential threat for the water tightness, it is finicky to use, because you always have to unscrew that second crown, putting stress on its gasket, the crystal needs a wider...
Agreed. But I must still defend IWC's honor!
The crown that turns the internal bezel on this watch does *not* screw down, so you don't have to unscrew it to use it. And there seems not to be much cost of pressure resistance in that, or the wide crystal, since this perfectly wearable watch has 2,000 ...
