foversta[PuristSPro Moderator]
20814
"That" is really impressive.
You are thinking about the Occhio Ripetizione Minuti which was working like an old camera. And like any de Grisogono watch, it was as bulky as this one with its thick and large lugs and less comfortable believe me.
The rotating dial is really impressive and much more complex to build than the diaphragm. That was for the pure technical side of the story.
But I also understand that for for aesthetical reasons and for the complication, you prefer the Occhio Ripetizione Minuti. It is maybe a more charming watch.
Thanks for your input.
Fx
All that for that???
By: amanico : October 6th, 2011-14:07
Aesthetically speaking, not my cup of tea, not at all... Thick, big, well... Not my cup of tea. Mechanically, I have my doubts, I was much more impressed by the watch which was released 7 or 8 years ago, in black gold, which worked ly the focus of a camer...
How many?
By: MTF : October 6th, 2011-17:33
FrX, Thank you for the report. Putting aside the "elephant in the room" to ignore the pushers for now, I like the idea of a choice of dial display x 4. The only watches in my.....er...'collection' that do this are the Casio ProTrek or Pathfinder But they ...
Very interesting reading...
By: dxboon : October 7th, 2011-08:28
...even if the watch looks like a brick of gold on the wrist! I actually find the rotating/hidden complications very amusing and enjoyable, but this piece aesthetically is not for me. For me, the De Grisogono watches too often are more interesting in theo...
.
By: takashi78 : October 10th, 2011-20:00
I think if they pt as much effort into designing the dial and case as much as the movement, we would have a killer watch. Cant fault their technical expertise though but the dial...errr....boring. To me at least.