Crescendo
16
Thank you for the clarification.
Oct 30, 2008,23:36 PM
Hello Mike,
Thank you for the clarification.
I hadn't even realised that it was a different model - I was more interested in showcasing the actual movement for the movement section of the review. Of course I'm still glad that you mentioned it. It's always best to avoid any possible chance of confusion.
Also, thank you for posting the picture of the true SBGW001 caseback. I have not seen that picture before. As you said, I never would have thought that the screws could be so intricate! Are those seals (o-rings)? What a novel idea. It's very reminiscent of a Rolex triplock crown. I can't recall seeing any other manufacturers using similar caseback screws. I wonder how functional they are, and whether or not the added 'complexity' has the potential to introduce any problems?
Judging by the earlier photos it would seem that the screw sinks are not functional when it comes to sealing the actual movement, so it would seem likely that the seals are there to prevent moisture incursion into the sinks themselves. Very interesting.
Thanks again.
Comments:
view entire thread
Grand Seiko SBGW001: A Review
By: Crescendo : October 29th, 2008-23:12
Hello, Thank you for choosing to read my review of the Grand Seiko SBGW0001. This will be my first post on PuristSPro, but my reticence is not out of a lack of appreciation. I very much enjoy reading the learned discussion both here and on the other brand...
Thank you.
By: Crescendo : October 30th, 2008-05:18
Wow, Crescendo, what a 1st post!
By: amanico : October 30th, 2008-08:13
Impressive work on a very informative review, my friend!!! A Purist Standard Review, indeed... Pics, informations, Passion, Enthusiasm, all is here... Welcome here, it's a pleasure to have you with us! Best. Nicolas
Outstanding review.
By: mobeme : October 30th, 2008-09:23
No stone left unturned! Many thanks. G.
A stellar review of one of my favorite watches . . .
By: Dr No : October 30th, 2008-09:49
. . . which happens to be on my very short future acquisition list. Here's a photo of Mike's GS on my wrist, taken at dusk last July (the background is the hood of a Mercedes) . . . . . . which illustrates the magnifying effect of a white dial on my equal...
Bravo! That sets the standard for a watch review!
By: cazalea : October 30th, 2008-11:12
Not only that, I love the conclusion, and already own the watch. And I know Dr. No agrees with me (as shown in him posting his arm) One correction; your last movement shot shows a gold GS watch with snap back, and that's not correct for the watch you are ...
What a terrific review!
By: sag : October 31st, 2008-09:56
Great watch...great post. Some shots of the sister (SBGW005)...
grand Seiko movement on U tube
By: sinohog1 : April 17th, 2009-00:49
the 9S67 movement is shown in detail in this video. However, it is a CAD video and not the actual movement. But is quite interesting. However, it is in Japanese. so I suggest skipping to the 5:10 time stamp and watching the rest with only music. But the f...
Sourcing a Grand Seiko
By: RDSChicago : September 16th, 2009-22:31
Living in the U.S., how can one source and purchase a Grand Seiko? Thanks!
Great Great review!
By: hans_jorgen_1968 : October 19th, 2009-04:17
Hi Crescendo Thankyou for your really great detailed description of the Grand Seiko and the truely remarkable SBGW001. I dont have any GS myself, byt learned about them some 2 years back when travelling to Japan. I unfortunately did not succeed in finding...
Thank you for a splendid read. First-rate review!
By: omdroparebop : October 20th, 2009-08:09
I really enjoyed your detailed review. I stumbled upon it in midst of a Google-search for Grand Seiko tang buckle ; one of my best side-tracks, ever. Your photos are splendid. The SBGW001 should be the benchmark for clarity of design. Lacking your patienc...
