john
829
Continuing test with new Aurigma uploaders...
..and some significant code changes of our own. Here goes, using the HTML5 Aurigma uploader first:
Continuing test with JPG compression turned off
This was also uploaded using the basic uploader: ...
Continuing test with new Aurigma uploaders...
..and some significant code changes of our own. Here goes, using the HTML5 Aurigma uploader first: ...
Continuing test with basic uploader
...which also uses the code changes related to how Imgscalr is used. Here goes: ...
Continuing test after enabling slight antialias in Imgscalr
The usual suspects, via the HTML5 uploader: ...
Continuing test with slight antialias in Imgscalr
These are uploaded using the basic uploader: ...
testing original image sizing
html5 loader manually scaled to 1280 original 2.5M 5K image manually scaled to 800 prior to upload ...
Continued testing with sharpening added for SCALED & POST
This is from the HTML5 Uploader: ...
More continued testing with sharpening added for SCALED & POST
this is from the basic uploader: ...
Final Test of Sharpening-Enhanced Uploaders
These are uploaded by the HTML5 uploader: ...
Final Test of Sharpening-Enhanced Uploaders, part 2
There were uploaded by the basic uploader: ...
The last picture and
theone on this are the 2 best results to me. Tell me please which final process I should follow when you know. It seems the Basic uploader is better than Flash version. Thanks! Cheers, Mark
How to get the best upload quality
Thank you for commenting on the improvement. The slight difference in quality you noticed between the basic and Flash/HTML5 uploaders only occurs if the original image is considerably larger than our largest stored image size (its longest dimension more t...
Perfect, thank you very much John
It is much easier to know how things work to do them well :) Thanks for your work. Cheers, Mark
Test HTML5 Uploader Wih Pre-sized Images
These were resized by Photoshop to have a largest dimension of 1280px before being uploaded: ...