Girard Perregaux

Interestingly, though very similar from the 1st glance many details are different, including: - case shapes and metals (Pt and WG) - hand shapes, colours and metals - movements (manual and auto) - while case sizes are similar, dial width is different due ...  

On the second I like the blued hands.....on second thought I like the first more sans the lack of blued hands. Honestly would be lucky to enjoy any one of them 😊 I don't envy your situation, it's a tough choice regardless you'll enjoy one of the Best Watc... 

jmho Or you could buy both

without the chapter ring.

And I like the more refined, smaller guilloche pattern and the hour markers around the dial. You can see, that I have a clear favorite.

I have been wearing both for some time and should say 4 most obvious differences when wearing them are: 1 Dial width. First watch feels smaller because of smaller dial. 2 Hands shape and colors. Both options are nice, but strikingly different. 3 Decoratio... 

due to the following reasons: 1, The smaller bezel makes the watch more attractive and it also mean there is less of the watch susceptible to being scratched. 2, The Roman numerals in the second one. 3. The more curved case design of the second one.

First of all huge congratulations 🎈🎊🎉 Whichever one you choose you will not go wrong - both are sublime. I personally have a slight preference for the first but like the crown and the hour ring on the second a tad better.

to choose.

...  

I pref it without the outer ring . But wouldn’t say no to either of these 😉👌🏻

By the way, noone has commented on different finishing of bridges, looks like this point is less important than I expected

different finishing of the bridges between the two models? Thanks

It is the shape that differs. The central part is thinner on one, and thicker on another. Both are nice, just different.