Girard Perregaux

First version of the 1966 Minute Repeater Annual Calendar: Or new one? The first version looks more contemporary while the new one plays a more classic tune with its guillochage on the center part of the dial and the applied figures. I tend to prefer the ...  

But if I would get to choose, I would go for the new one! Because of the more classic look and more beautiful decoration. I am a big fan of pure design, but the applied numbers on the new version... Lovely! :) Thank you for sharing these two, Fx! Best Blo... 

Thanks Blomman for your comments! Fx ...  

I would drop the annual calendar and only enjoy a pure classic minute repeater as just shown in the forum by chronosRM. Great to see the comparison on your wrist, they are still incredible pieces, even out-smarted by its simple cousin. CC

The MR is a hell of a Watch. These complicated MRs are not my taste at all. The complications ruin the dial. IMO... Best, Nicolas

Sincerely Damjan

Just not as busy. ( But I am sure all of you knew which way I would go given the choice. So very predictable...)

The older version is sort of obscure and odd... People will ask, how do you tell time on it. What does it mean? The newer version has a more jewelry look to it, and somehow seems less mysterious, but also more busy. My verdict: reconsider this model altog...