Why is the seamaster compared to the submariner when.....
in reality it’s closer to the seadweller? Both have the dot markers on the bezel. Both have helium escape valves. Both bigger than 40mm Both have red text Both had no cylclopse ( previous version) ...
I feel with you but you don't do it better. The Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial is the actual model that should be compared to the Submariner.
The Planet Ocean as competitor for the Sea-Dweller and the Overseas 2000V as competitor for the Nautilus 5711 and Royal Oak 15202. Also the A. Lange 1815 as competitor for the 5170... just a few examples.
But the planet ocean looks nothing like any Rolex really.
It’s thicker. It’s got a different dial with different markers. In fact I think it’s closer to the fifty fathoms from a dial perspective
I have a Submariner but I do not dive, deepest it's been is probably the kitchen or bathroom sink. Out of curiosity how many people
really dive past 100 ft anyway?? I'm guessing there may be a few here who do but the majority get no deeper than a neighborhood, home or hotel pool.
I will rinse it with water when it gets really dirty
that is how close mine will come close to water
I have on straight air
When I was younger and stupider. Hit 135 once, it was an experience. Easy to kill yourself. I was wearing a 100 meter swiss army watch with no sctew down, the seals completely gave out a week later when I was in the shower. Now with dive computers and a b...