Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Chronographs Comparison
Discussion

Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Chronographs Comparison

By Watchlover42 · Sep 24, 2021 · 29 replies
Watchlover42
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
29 replies6913 views1 photos
f ๐• in ๐Ÿ’ฌ โœ‰ ๐Ÿ”—

Watchlover42 initiates a compelling discussion comparing two Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar Chronographs: the Ref. 3970R and the Ref. 5270G. This exploration delves into the nuances of design, movement, and wearability that define these iconic references, inviting collectors to weigh in on their relevance in today's horological landscape. Watchlover42's side-by-side presentation highlights the subtle yet significant differences between these highly coveted timepieces.

29 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
One of the last 3970R from the last series and a 5270G from the first series. 41 vs. 36 mm. So different but so alike. Both sizes are great to wear. I really love them both ๐Ÿ˜



About the Patek Philippe Grand Complications Ref. 3970

The Patek Philippe reference 3970 is a perpetual calendar chronograph, a complication central to the brand's heritage. It succeeded the highly regarded reference 2499 and served as a bridge to the later reference 5970. The 3970 was produced over an extended period, allowing for several series and subtle variations in its design, making it a significant model for collectors interested in the evolution of Patek Philippe's complicated wristwatches.

This reference features a 36mm case, commonly found in 18k white gold, yellow gold, rose gold, and platinum. It is powered by the manual-wind caliber CH 27-70 Q, based on a Lemania รฉbauche, which offers a power reserve of 60 hours. The watch is fitted with a sapphire crystal, protecting a dial that typically includes subdials for the chronograph, perpetual calendar displays, and moon phases.

The 3970 appeals to collectors seeking a classic Patek Philippe perpetual calendar chronograph with a traditional aesthetic and a historically important movement. Its long production run from 1986 to 2004 means that examples from different series, such as the first, second, and third, exhibit minor differences in dial layout and case details, providing distinct collecting opportunities within the reference.

Specifications

Caliber
CH 27-70 Q
Case
18k white gold
Diameter
36mm
Dial
Silver
Water Resist.
25m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
GL
GLau
Sep 24, 2021
Congrats on having a

great pair of PCC ! ๐Ÿ‘

JO
joenghenry
Sep 24, 2021
Both are stunning and iconic. I would suggest adding a 5970 to complete the collection of affordable new vintage Patek PCC.

WR
Wristenthusiast
Sep 24, 2021
I am in the minority butโ€ฆ

I prefer the 3970 to the 5970. The 5970 had the case upsized but not the movement and it shows. When you look at the 3970, itโ€™s proportions are consistent throughout. You think the 5270 is well balanced. I even am ok with the โ€œchinโ€ models, though those needed a longer seconds hand. Just my opinion of course.

WA
Watchlover42
Sep 24, 2021
I prefer the 3970 to the 5970 as well. Like both models due to the proper sized movements and the missing tachymeter scale

MI
MikiJ
Sep 24, 2021
Only because there's so much to see...

I'd vote for the 5279, but I'd love to be wearing either one

AM
amanico
Sep 24, 2021
The second one, for me. Which is a pure jewel.

Available on the marketplace

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →