The other day I was at the Chopard boutique and something caught my eye. That does not happen often with Chopard. I respect the LUC range for its quality and construction but their designs leave me lukewarm. I once owned two LUC watches, one was the origi...
many thanks SJX, it is just timely. Arthur mentioned this watch to me last night in the Chopard forum. this watch even has not been displayed in the Chopard website. he suggested me to go down to the shop to check out this beautiful watch. he said i shoul...
and for the nice pics. It does look inviting and I did make an effort to try to see one in the metal but no luck.I guess they aren't in HK yet. Will have to wait for an account from our very discerning JLC moderator to see if it passes the test.
As we soon have a L.U.C Dinner, it will be the opportunity to have an eye on it. From what I see on your pics, it seems that the finish is appealing, and that the layout of the dial ( my biggest problem with L.U.C watches ) looks nice. Best, and thanks fo...
I'm discovering L.U.C watches... Will tell you once I see it in the flesh. But right now, from the pics I see, the " à priori " is positive. Best, Nicolas
Beyond the swan neck regulator on the 1.96 which the 9.96 does not have. There are some aesthetic differences, like the rotor decoration and style of engraving, but those are visual rather than indicators of finishing quality. - SJX
I know I cant hv the beehive and admire the nice sml rotor movement unless they do one with an officer case . I pray that they do one someday . This is a very tech twisty version of a QF , a smart play of design . Thanks SJX
...that's some icy goodness, SJX. Stellar photos of an attractive watch. I continue to really enjoy the LUC line from Chopard. This one gets added onto my list of Chopard faves, which also currently includes the steel Chrono One, Strike One (both the clas...