Rob
1846
Remarkable in-depth review indeed...
makes one pause and wonder how anyone into fine and classic watchmaking with a touch of present day aesthetics could have missed this. Basing said review from your superbly written perspective shows the answer.
This most likely is not a watch that elicits love at first sight but endears itself after some time. Thanks for bringing this under-appreciated watch some attention. Am sure that this will bear a second look from many of us here, me included.
Thanks again JX!!
Vive la difference!
By: MTF : February 16th, 2010-06:10
SJX, Thanks SJX for the detailed and personal review. As an old fan of the LUC watches with an original Ref 16/1860/1, I prefer the classic designs from Chopard and find the Tech series design (hehehe) .... a bit bland Vive la difference! There is somethi...
Nice review SJX!
By: patrick_y : February 16th, 2010-09:40
As a fan of micro-rotored movements, I am quite a fan of the 1.96 and 9.96 Chopard movements. Thank you for the impressive macro photographs. I first scanned the photographs prior to reading the actual review and I too noticed the 12 on the dial to be sli...
Outstanding report..
By: nitediver : February 17th, 2010-19:14
...about a brand that is less talked about. I am not so negative about their designs, i liked for example the LUC regulator which is quite bold in its design without going over board But then this is a matter of personal taste. thanks for your outstanding...
Thanks, SJX!
By: dxboon : February 20th, 2010-08:57
First, congratulations on attaining a beautiful timepiece. I think this is the best of the Qualite Fleurier line. The dial is so very attractive. It manages to be both elegant and youthful, edgy. Not an easy feat! The L.U.C. movement is beautifully finish...