kolosstt
1455
Hacking or not.
I just read a couple of posts here amongst purists as well as other sites that even 1.96 would not be hacking. Remembered that 4.96 was also not hacking.
We don't have an overview?
Cheers,
Kolosstt
.
By: amblin_xi : August 13th, 2017-01:38
Hi MTF, thanks a ton for the input, this is what I thought aswell. Very strange since the watch was in my formal wear rotation so haven't seen a lot of action . Already sent an email to info@ and awaiting their official reply. But the curious thing is tha...
...
By: amblin_xi : August 13th, 2017-07:30
I got the answer Chopard actually called me back, from their HQ on Sunday, now that's what I call appropriate customer care and service. Their reply is that there were THREE official versions as shown in the catalogue but also slight variations during the...
Also
By: amblin_xi : August 13th, 2017-09:25
Thought fellow board members would like to know, the total yearly production capability for the 'poinçon de genève' 1.96 and complication variants (96QP etc.) is around 4000-5000 . A
And
By: amblin_xi : August 13th, 2017-09:59
And rather interestingly the movements in my twist and the lunar one were assembled by the same watchmaker, I guess this is one of the benefits buying a smaller brand with low production figures because you can actually feel that your piece was made by so...
Indeed.
By: amblin_xi : August 15th, 2017-03:35
The quoted figure is for current rate of production. Back in the days when Chopard first introduced the original limited edition 1860 and 1.96 the number was much lower and up to around the year 2009 -2010 the number stayed at around 600-800 per year. Reg...