Blancpain

May not be the most scientific survey but I am very curious to collect your opinion. You have two pictures of my Leman GMT Alarm Ti. Picture (A) is original. Picture (B) is a "touched up" version that replicates the hands of a Leman Chrono Flyback. Which ...  

BUT, I prefer the original. The partially skeletted hands aren't here for nothing else than avoiding to hide the informations dispalyed on the dial. With the full hands, they avoid these informations. Best, Nicolas

No message body This message has been edited by Yves007 on 2009-11-21 22:40:14

No message body

I also perfer the orignal hands. Brian

think that you should keep the original..... Nicolas is right, the subdials would be covered...... Cheers

Yves, I definitely agree on the visibility factor of the full-length luminescent hands but am unsure if they go with this watch. I think perhaps the other dial style (with full military numerals) of the GMTAlarm might be better suited for such a modificat... 

I asked some of your questiones. Readability? Change of the hands? ...? The original version looks good to me, but not when it is dark. Readability is/was the issue for me. A picture to explain my issue: Looks ok on the picture, but is getting worse after...  

Not at all what I expected. The main thing that I retain is that 140 people read the post and only 6 answered, for a whoppy 4%. It is my highiest number of replies since being a member of the Purists ProForum, about 4 years ago, despite some very well wri... 

mean s h o u t i n g. Did you know it, or was it even your intention? Most people using this, don´t get any responses at a forum like this. Just a thought. The watch world is not that big and you asked the same question at least in two places. You got all... 

I fully agree with you Oliver..... Cheers ps I did not know that capital letters signify shouting.......