jeremyr
95
Not at all
Like I said before quality wise they are all the same I just feel the royal oaks are timeless and the safari is a theme watch that will go out of style eventually.
15400OR VS AP safari26170ST
By: scottie : June 25th, 2012-21:20
After doing the comparison between 15400OR and 25320OR for a while, i 've "KINDA" decided to go for 15400OR due to its in-house movement, but i recently bumped into a friend who wore an AP offshore safari, and i suddenly fell for it after tried it on, lov...
This is true, but ...
By: AndrewD : June 25th, 2012-22:45
... the value of these questions is that it allows owners to describe what they like and don't like about the watches in question. Sometimes they point out aspects you hadn't considered. They allow you see something new through their eyes. And even better...
Non-Offshore chrono...
By: fai9al_429 : June 26th, 2012-00:19
I say go for the non-offshore chrono. This way you get "some" of the wrsit presense that the Offshore has (plus the new size 41mm) and at the same time you still get am elegant refined watch that is not as loud as the Offshore. Good luck anyways :)
My choice
By: jeremyr : July 1st, 2012-19:38
My choice is the 15400 as i have owned the safari years ago and it didn't last long. I feel the royal oak is a classic and I love the new size and dials of the 41mm. The 15400 is closer to the original 1970's design and will become a new classic IMHO.