Thanks for the comments foversta,

Dec 11, 2015,17:16 PM
 

1) This is something I overlooked. It's quite easy to get lost in the chronograph module on the displayback side, I forget there is still another layer of movement for the timekeeping side!

I'd like to at least back up my claims however, that the chronograph module of the double split is based on the L951. Here is a link to the L951.6 and L001.1 overlayed. Besides the updated reset lever of the Dato up/down, it can be seen the rest of the chronograph movement architecture is practically identical, while the rattrapante is built upon it. Therefore, I reckon that the going train side underneath the chronograph has been optimised on the double split, maximizing use of the space without the big date of the datograph. As a 3Hz movement on the DS, perhaps the 4th wheel is modified?

To my knowledge, the three other standalone unique chronograph calibres Lange produce are the Tourbograph, the Rattrapante Chrono and the grand complication.

2) I vaguely remember reading that once now (your previous post?), thanks for the clarification. A Maltese cross is quite logical; limiting the range of mainspring that can be utilised to retain good accuracy. Perhaps they removed it as Lange was much more conservative in their earlier years? I'd definitely like to see photos of the going train and bigdate mechanism of the L951 for further study.

Regards, skyeriding This message has been edited by skyeriding on 2015-12-11 17:22:07


More posts: CalibresDatographLange Double Split

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

An insight into the different Lange L951 Calibres

 
 By: skyeriding : December 11th, 2015-10:46
Hello, This long-winded commentary is based on my observation and research on the various Lange L951 calibres that exist today. By the end of this writing, I hope I could cover the different incremental changes Lange has done to the chronograph calibre an...  

Thanks a lot for this excellent article Skyeriding!

 
 By: foversta : December 11th, 2015-13:53
I would like to make two remarks. 1) I'm not sure that the DS is based on the L951: it may share of course some elements but the frequency is not the same 2) for me the increase of the power reserve was due more to the removal of a maltese cross rather th... 

Thanks for the comments foversta,

 
 By: skyeriding : December 11th, 2015-17:16
1) This is something I overlooked. It's quite easy to get lost in the chronograph module on the displayback side, I forget there is still another layer of movement for the timekeeping side! I'd like to at least back up my claims however, that the chronogr... 

Very informative!

 
 By: smartbot : December 11th, 2015-20:53
Excellent review. Now I feel a bit more knowledgable about the 1815 Chrono movement. Thanks for posting!

Thanks smartbot,

 
 By: skyeriding : December 11th, 2015-23:12
I remember oogling over your HD vids of the 1815 Chrono. Simply beautiful! Regards, skyeriding

Terrific writing, congratulations!

 
 By: heartbreaker : December 11th, 2015-23:14
You made me remind that the fascination coming from the watches' mechanics was the thing that put me in this passion, when I was only a little boy. Thank you, I'm looking forward for other articles from you! Ciao, Elio

Thanks Ello!

 
 By: skyeriding : December 12th, 2015-01:24
I have written previous articles before (which I won't link here) but did not post them on this forum. They are related to my fascination with chronographs and rattrapantes... Regards, skyeriding

As a followup

 
 By: skyeriding : December 12th, 2015-01:21
I did more searching online and realised a couple photos that contradicts my findings. Eg there are some old official Lange Calibre photos of the L951.1 that show updated chrono spring levers, or L952.1 that hasn't been updated. However, from actual photo...