...but I must disagree with the conclusions about value, finishing, and product/market fit.
In the first case, it is most certainly not a haute horlogerie calibre. The Etachron regulation, smooth balance, unused jeweling, and unfinished main plate, disqualify this movement from consideration alongside VCs other movements or those from Lange, Patek, or even JLC.
In terms of value, better horological value can be had from JLC, Rolex, etc. at a lower price (and sans date). These brands offer free-sprung balances, chronographs, and overcoil springs (in the case of Rolex), that were apparently deemed “too much” for this more-expensive watch. Im not worried as much about in-house or not, or Geneva seal or not. They should have just used an appropriate movement, whether from JLC, Piaget, Chronode or some other specialist, or In-house.
In terms of product market fit with the millennial generation, I think VC has missed the mark. The millennial watch enthusiasts I know, myself Included, tend to get very into the details of what they’re buying and I think many will see through VCs ploy to capture this market with a substandard product.
My opinions on the watch aside, I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and for taking the time to create such a nice and informative post!
Best,
Brandon