I think it's not exactly the watch for most PuristSPro readers. Keep in mind, PuristSPro readers are the most sophisticated readers about watches in any public online forum in the world. And I've read many of your posts in the past years Bruno, I know nothing gets past you.
In the article, I did mention some of the "shortcomings" of the Vacheron Constantin movement. But I also wanted to push its strengths; 1, it's a great value; 2, it has the ability to impact a very wide audience that would normally be priced out of a Vacheron Constantin watch.
You're right, to the PuristSPro audience, some will question if it's a truly "high horology" timepiece. Heck, even on PuristSPro, we have readers with very high standards who don't consider it "haute horlogery" unless it's highly finished and with some high complication. Let's say, this would be considered "entry-level haute-horlogerie," and there's nothing wrong with entry level. Porsche's Boxster/Cayman is a great car, I found it better for me than the 911 much of the time.
In the end, it's the effort that Vacheron Constantin has made, and the disruption it will likely create, that makes this watch so significant. It may not affect you and me directly, I'm not likely to be buying one right away. But it will be a watch worn by so many others!