heartbreaker
818
What's Richard Mille for me...
Oct 14, 2015,23:40 PM
Thank you Mark, you've put in a few lines what's RM for you.
I can't add comments nor pictures, basically because I've never had the opportunity to try a RM, even if their AD is just a short step from my home.
When I've heard for the first time about RM, more then a decade ago, they was defined "The Formula 1 of wachmaking" or "Hi-Tech luxury". We should agree that many quick definition are insufficient to explain something and in this case it's more true than ever, since RM is far more.
And yet, when I started to widen my knowledge for watches, strangely enough I've fallen in the bad and wrong perception you have cited: "a RM tonneau-shape looks only very similar to another RM tonneau-shape". And I stopped follow the brand's evolution.
However, in recent years I went back to appreciate RM, for various reasons:
- all of their research isn't and end in itself;
- they've intentionally chosen to compete in a league of their own;
- they had success above all thanks to their arguments and not only for their marketing;
- they've decided to steadily remain faithful to the inital choices in terms of design, without any turnaround.
That said, I applaude RM, even if their watches will remain absolutely out of reach for me. At least, this will mean that I could look at them with complete serenity! ;-)
Ciao,
Elio