My thoughts about the original Richard Mille RM035 and the brand

Oct 05, 2015,16:05 PM
 

Dear Purists,

The Richard Mille RM035 was unveiled in 2011 and produced during around 2 years and is named after its RM027 cousin. In many ways it is an exceptional Richard Mille, especially regarding its price range in the catalogue.







I'm a great fan and admirer of Richard Mille's technical marvels, not only because I think his case style is on the verge to become a modern classic (as well as ones of the nicest watches for women), that it is very well conceived but also because of the unusual technical features found in his movements, especially considering the materials used and the difficulty to master them compared to traditional material like gold or brass and steel.

We all have our own tastes and different ways we've come to like watches from.

Personally, I need both classical and modern, not at the same time but I need to go to one and then switch back to the other from time to time. I really need both.

Aside from the aesthetical field, I particularly believe in the genius of the construction design of the whole case and movement as well as in the material involved in its creation.







We can always suspect that Marketing techniques may be hiding behind choices brands make but the difficulty of coping with the materials Richard Mille watchmakers are working with, among the strongest metallic alloys used in very high-tech aeronautics vehicles or in any kind of racing (cars, sailing etc...) is not a smoke screen.

Of course we can always ask ourselves if it is necessary. But many discoveries would not have existed if some people didn't feel the need to go further.

Richard Mille decided to go further and in another direction, not only because it was different but because of its personal background, its curiosity and will to bring something else, more faithful to what he likes as from car racing etc... Nobody is obliged to follow him on that path, in the same way as people who remain conservative can't criticize this endeavour.







Frankly, if I could have imagine creating my own brand and project in the watchmaking field, I think I would have liked to do what he did from 2001. But certainly would not have done it as good as he did with his teams.

In the past, as many watch fans I think, I tried to choose each watch I could consider in my wish list from different brands as it brings diversity. But as time goes by, tastes evolve and I think I can also determine what I like and want. Richard Mille is the kind of brand I'd like to possess more than one piece from, even if for most people only knowing RM from his name, a RM tonneau-shape looks only very similar to another RM tonneau-shape. I think this is a wrong perception to have.

For the pleasure of dreaming, I've been looking at different references, more clearly starting to know what I find interesting (and also lacking) concerning each of RM's models. There are many specific elements I tend to like: the winding rotor (I love this feature and the way it is designed and looks in RM watches), the tonneau case's shape of course (a very important element of RM's success I think), even the round case's shape (like in the fantastic RM033 or the new RM063-01 "Dizzy Hands"), the Carbon-based materials and more generally all the exotic material, the fact it is shock-resistant and not fragile, the lightness and thus the comfort, the flawless finishing that should not be underestimated etc....







My favorite RMs were the first RM027 for a while with its beautiful Lital movement and Carbon nanotubes polymer case but also the RM021 Aerodyne with its honeycomb dial and turbine looking sub-dials. To me, Richard Mille technique and tough lightness were united in these two watches.

As an owner of the RM035, I was looking at what I could like from the RM catalogue in a more "affordable" budget (if we can say so) than the tourbillon models.

Well, I must say that I finally got back... to the original RM035.

Of course I love the RM011 or the RM030 but I wanted to keep the small size case (roughly there are 2 sizes in RM's catalogue). Even the last RM035 Americas is now bigger (with a caliber design I like less) whereas the original RM035 is 48x39.7x12.25 mm.

I also prefer something light (the RM011 is quite heavier) and something in Titanium or black (but no PVD or DLC) to remain as discreet as light. In that respect, the Magnesium-Aluminum alloy (90% Magnesium and 8.9% Aluminum) coated with the Miarox process (Ceramic coating) was something very interesting.

It wasn't so when it was launched but I finally came lately to like also the new RM027-01's look a lot with its thinner case, its fantastic cable-fastened movement, its lightness and shock-resistance.

However, in the end, the RM035 ticks all the right boxes (except the automatic winding feature). To compensate, the RM035 is equipped with a very practical sliding flange to avoid over-winding tensions and a fantastic winding feeling: it is light and smooth with a little metallic "click" noise.

The movement is a completely rebuilt movement from the gear train base of a Vaucher caliber. It is composed of a twin barrel display with a 65 hours power reserve.







Furthermore, the RM035 is the first RM watch (and only I think) to be Chronofiable certified (see further details at the end of the post) which means it has been subject to hard tests ensuring the wearer it is particularly shock-resistant and remains accurate.

I like the solid caseback as well which helps focusing on the skeletonized movement (and not the skin and hair) and which brings additional shock and torsion resistance.







I was talking about comfort earlier, a criterion I wasn't paying attention to until I tried an RM010, the first RM I could handle several years ago. The RM035 benefits from a less than 40 gr weight (including a 4.3 gr movement, its Carbon flange, Titanium baseplate and bridges, Ti deployant buckle and a polyurethane rubber strap) which implies also it is quite hard to come back to much heavier gold or even steel watches afterwards.


To conclude this "thoughts" thread about the RM035 and generally about Richard Mille products, this watch is really a very well calibrated concentration of Richard Mille DNA: the style design, the conception of the integrated movement and case, the shock-resistance, the accuracy and the ergonomic qualities which bring comfort (from shape as well as lightness).

It is flawless to me.


I hope you've enjoyed reading this and please feel free to share your experience about your current or previous RM and/or picture if you can!

Cheers, Mark


PS: my review of the RM035: www.watchprosite.com


_________________________________________________________________

Chronofiable test :

The Chronofiable® test, developed at the beginning of the 80’s by the CCF SA (centre de contrôle de la fiabilité de l’horlogerie Suisse, taken over in 1985 by the Laboratoire Dubois SA), was devised to expose timepieces to an accelerated aging test simulating over 21 days, the equivalent of 6 months effective wear. This is achieved by the execution of a long series of tests such as the initial monitoring of the movement functions, an additional rate, the amplitude test taken at two temperature levels (0°C and 50°C), the monitoring of the power reserve and the winding velocity. Included in this artificial ageing cycle test are extensive linear and angular accelerations as well as some 20,000 shocks ranging from 250 to 5500 m/s2 (9.81 m/s2=1g).

The last step is a final monitoring phase applying the same elements than during the initial monitoring. Conditions like these attest unequivocally to the ability of the movement to withstand an array of extreme conditions without experiencing any effects on its performance.
 
Chronofiable® is a registered trademark belonging to the Laboratoire Dubois SA.
_________________________________________________________________




PS: This watch is not mine anymore since I sold it.



This message has been edited by Mark in Paris on 2016-05-21 15:21:07


More posts: Dizzy HandsRM010RM011RM021RM027RM027-01RM030RM033RM035RM063-01

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

 
 By: KMII : October 5th, 2015-22:04
And IMHO this is the best looking RM full stop. Thank you also for the review, and for bringing life with it to light. Definitely one for the far in the future wish list.

Indeed it is a question of taste and of wrist size as well

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 6th, 2015-15:41
Thanks a lot for the very kind words. I thought these watches are rare enough to at least share an experience and point of view! Cheers, Mark

Agree fully :)

 
 By: KMII : October 6th, 2015-21:36
And one needs to be prepared and informed for when the time and possibility comes

You're right, that's how I work too

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 23rd, 2015-12:55
Secondarily, it helps making less mistakes. Cheers, Mark

Interesting

 
 By: colton_d : October 6th, 2015-05:47
Mark, Very interesting to hear your approach to assessing which RM is best for you, and happy to hear this RM035 has maintained its beauty in your eyes over the years. Your thoughts and photos are very good to read. Believe it or not, my first experience ... 

My pleasure Colton and I'm glad you liked it :)

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 6th, 2015-15:49
I know you appreciate the brand, so it started with this one? That's a great reference indeed to discover the brand's qualities. As fo the strap, I must say I love this one as it extends the case's shape is a perfect way. I also prefer the honeycomb patte... 

Great report mark and spot on

 
 By: Mohannad (aka Riddler) : October 6th, 2015-10:00
I totally agree with your approach and I do share the same attitude towards Richard Mille But there\'s one additional factor for me and that is the MAN himself I had the pleasure of meeting drinking and dinning with Richard a couple of times all in paris ... 

Glad you enjoyed it

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 7th, 2015-15:09
Yes, you're right: I've seen several videos of his interviews and talk to him a few minutes, he is a true aesthete and very direct man to discuss with. Yes the RM010 is a fantastic RM. I like many aspects of this ref (skeletonized dial, rotor, lightness a... 

Great Feature - Thank You Mark

 
 By: Paoloj : October 6th, 2015-13:19
I'm teetering on the edge of an RM035 purchase and this may well tip me over. Are other strap options available for the 35 ... Would those available for the RM010 fit ? I think the only real contender for me at the moment is an RM030 in either Ti or one o... 

Straps availability

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 8th, 2015-15:45
First, thank you P, I'm glad you liked it! About the strap, the only alternative I was informed of, 1 year ago, was the Kevlar strap. It is the kind of strap which was used with the original RM027 at first and, then, adapted to the RM035. I don't think th... 

Aesthetically, Richard Mille is not my absolute favourite brand, but I cannot argue ...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : October 14th, 2015-07:23
that this brand is following a very clear technology, materials and design path. In doing so, RM does not stop short before seemingly immense hurdles* are tackled. This earns them my unconditional respect. Moreover, together with De Bethune I would count ... 

Watchmaking progress

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 18th, 2015-15:05
I totally share your opinion on that matter. Of course, there is room for more traditionnal work too. However, as for those 2 brands you mention, they are very much into bringing progress and horology in the 21st century. Thanks a lot for your comments Ma... 

What's Richard Mille for me...

 
 By: heartbreaker : October 14th, 2015-23:40
Thank you Mark, you've put in a few lines what's RM for you. I can't add comments nor pictures, basically because I've never had the opportunity to try a RM, even if their AD is just a short step from my home. When I've heard for the first time about RM, ... 

It is a good thing to remain curious and open in the watchmaking world

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 15th, 2015-03:02
I experienced it myself. Sometimes it doesn't work of course, but many times I discovered something I was going to miss. I read your answer to Magnus' De bethune article and I see you have this curiosity to give the chance to change your mind. It is a rea... 

RM brand

 
 By: tom2517 : October 18th, 2015-22:41
To me it\'s a brand that came at a right time and perfect marketing. RM started with making nothing themselves, even the famous case was outsourced, they just do design. Now that they make the case in house, but the movement still outsourced. It is such a... 

Good strategy

 
 By: Mark in Paris : October 19th, 2015-14:18
I think this strategy came, from the beginning, from Richard Mille's mind and personal taste concerning cars etc. The watches he wanted have been conceived exactly from his tastes and the marketing came later on to introduce it to the market (in a very cl... 

great read

 
 By: kunmoo : January 11th, 2016-21:42
RM035, this particular model is one that I hope to acquire some day. to my smaller wrist size, I think this size is perfect fit and most comfortable. it is a great looking watch! ...  

The size matters a lot

 
 By: Mark in Paris : January 14th, 2016-16:40
I think it changes the wearability so much, but also the aesthetical look. Thank you Kunmoo! Cheers, Mark

technical question

 
 By: lee__07 : July 16th, 2016-11:17
Great review Mark! I just learned two new facts of my watch that I didnt realize up until now which is great because it always got me wondering. Would be very helpful if you could further explain: Could you explain how to look at the twin barrel display t... 

Thank you Lee :)

 
 By: Mark in Paris : July 16th, 2016-12:55
Welcome on PuristSPro by the way and congratulations for getting this reference. When you look at the twin barrels from the front side, we can see that the movement is fully wound when the coils are all toward the center (axle). When the watch is not work... 

finally figured it out!

 
 By: lee__07 : July 16th, 2016-13:17
It was my pleasure reading your reference, and many thanks again for making this finally clear for me . I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future hope you keep up the great work! regards, lee

Phenomenal review

 
 By: keks : September 20th, 2016-12:04
I note you mention the RM035 Americas is different size and has a different caliber from the RM035. Do you happen to know whether the case materials are different?

Thank you very much keks :)

 
 By: Mark in Paris : September 29th, 2016-14:27
I'm glad you could enjoy it. About the America, it is made of TZP Ceramic for the bezel and caseback while the caseband is made of NTPT. Quite a great combination Cheers, Mark

Thank you!

 
 By: bulliondesk : September 26th, 2016-12:30
One of my favorite RM's! An absolute beauty and pleasure to wear.

My pleasure!

 
 By: Mark in Paris : September 29th, 2016-14:28
We share the same opinion indeed. The wearing experience is really something very unique and that's also why I love wearing RM watches so much, even when big. Cheers, Mark

how do you think the potential aftersale problem of the 035 case?

 
 By: Ranger1 : April 15th, 2017-03:22
first of all, I am also a fan of RM035. I think the size of this watch is perfectly showing the beauty of RM and super light at the same time. as you said, the case was welled treated with a coating material. I should say, it's looks great, but the proble... 

Well, I never had problems with mine

 
 By: Mark in Paris : April 15th, 2017-03:49
but I tried to be very careful. I don't think it can be scratched, like steel or PVD/DLC (unless it takes a more significant hit). However, it can indeed mark, living a kind of grey line and I don't know if it is easy to correct. Back then, I was told tha...