WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Zenith

Such honesty merits . . .

 

. . . a full reply :-0!

The 40th Anniversary resonated from its inception, Marcus. It exhibits almost every element that matters to me - a true manufacture movement, and an excellent one at that, appealing cushion case design with elements of angularity and curvature, overall dimensions in keeping with my slender wrist, and pleasing proportions. My collection has not had a rugged sports watch in some time, and the void was one I felt deeply. There were other watches under consideration, including Grand Seikos, Rolexes, Omegas, and Glashüttes, but this particular Zenith . . .





. . . matched them in every respect, and went an element better by offering an integral chronograph complication. Then came the Striking 10th . . .





. . . which simply did not hold my attention aesthetically like the 40th, but had one overwhelming advantage:

I placed an order for the 40th Anniversary model several weeks ago, but then suffered nagging second thoughts, as the Striking 10th iteration of the El Primero represents an actually useful enhancement. After spending the better part of an hour examining one in detail, the order was changed to the limited edition of the Striking 10th shown above. After another week had passed, though, I came to the realization that the usefulness of the Striking 10th did not sufficiently compensate for the aesthetic qualities offered by the 40th Anniversary, and consequently changed the order again. I can only hope the patience of the sales representative wasn't overly taxed.





"The heart has its reasons that reason knows nothing of."    This message has been edited by Dr No on 2011-02-01 13:01:02

  login to reply