MichaelC[AP Moderator]
22294
I would never sell UN short.
I suspect I will have a caliber 118 piece one day as new variations are released.
I just expected more out of this release. I think back to how exciting the first shots you posted of the 160 were. Not just the movement, but the entire watch.
Here I see the RG piece as aesthetically very similar to the Anniversary chronometer they did, and the steel/ti piece as not much different than the other pieces that have been out for years. So in my eyes it is still a very somber way to launch this much anticipated caliber. The RG piece really does look good, but it does not move me or stir any emotions.
Aaah, finally!
By: amanico : March 7th, 2012-07:39
We were waiting for this one for a very long time, and here it is. The movement seems to be fantastic. Can you confirm that the Cal 160 is out, at the benefit of the Cal 118? The only problem I have is the presence of the Date... I would much have preferr...
45mm???
By: aaronm : March 7th, 2012-08:36
Are they going to sell it with a gymbal mount for deck-use as well? The new movement is good news, I was afraid it was going to be the "Chinese Democracy" of movements, and UN was going to keep holding awaiting it A
Mixed feelings for me.
By: MichaelC : March 7th, 2012-09:56
I have been very excited to see the caliber 118 piece and here it is. I certainly had a different design in my mind. The titanium/steel version, while unlimited and available, fails for me on aesthetics. What an opportunity to create a modern chronometer ...
A few comments and pics.
By: foversta : March 14th, 2012-13:03
I really like this watch and I would like to sum up in a few words the pros and cons I felt: pros: - the size: yes, I found it perfect. A big size is coherent for a "Marine Chronometer" watch and moreover, the "lugs" are short and improve the comfort on t...