MichaelC[AP Moderator]
21988
As I understood the explantion there is nothing to send...
The movements used in the Black Ocean were not certified by the COSC. Thus, there is no paperwork. UN obviously regulates them in-house anyways, so I really don't care about a paper from a third party. I actually prefer the confidence of a company who assures its own accuracy. But as you indicate, this approach is different for UN, which typically has their movements tested by the COSC. Perhaps that is why this dial has "MARINE DIVER CHRONOMETER" printed on it instead of "OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED CHRONOMETER". I think "MDC" looks much better anyways 
Black Ocean
By: MichaelC : September 2nd, 2009-10:10
I wanted to share a few quick pictures with my friends here at thePurists. The Black Ocean has arrived. The DLC is very dark with a smooth and consistent finish. The ceramic links and clasp have a beautiful satin brushing. Having owned a few divers over t...
hhmmm ....
By: Marcus Hanke : September 5th, 2009-11:08
This puzzles me a little. Until now I had thought that the term "chronometer" was protected in Switzerland, and only the COSC is able to make a watch a "chronometer" (notabene, in Switzerland, only. In Germany, there is no legal restriction of the use of ...