halgedahl
1333
Many thanks. Expected as much.
It has been interesting to me to learn that the PC is not so new a complication as, for example, the auto-chrono. And a perpetual stands, in my brief collecting career, as "the one that got away."
When the Montblanc came on the market a couple years ago it caused quite a stir at ~$12K. (In steel, of course.) A lot of collectors were upset. And there was a lot of bad press about the "crowded dial." Now, understand, I was just a year into my fascination with time pieces, so at the same time I was mighty fascinated with the idea of the perpetual, and crestfallen to think that I'd never own one due to the ~$20K club entry fee. But now the Montblanc was out there.
I also knew that one might find a previously owned piece for essentially half msrp. Perhaps I could wait this out. I hadn't a lot of money, yet perhaps I could stretch to upwards of $6K. Then in one of my daily forum perusals I found a post advertising this $12K watch for just over $4K—brand new! One-third its value, not one-half, and never worn. Too good to be true? Such things usually are. Still, I was mighty interested, and corresponded with the fellow selling the watch. It turned out he'd bought out an AD who was going out of business and wasn't particularly interested in making a killing on the watches he had for sale. Nice fellow; seemed completely transparent. I was convinced of the watch's authenticity, and the fact that in some ways it represented "the buy of the century." But all that bad press! And I had no way of trying one on short of driving to Chicago to an AD to scope out the timepiece.
So I let it go. Months passed and the thing hadn't sold. (I guessed the bad press was something I was right to have paid attention to.) And then it came time for a trip to Napa, CA to see my uncle. As I passed through O'Hare I decided to stop in at the Montblanc boutique. Here's the result.

Montblanc Heritage Spirit Perpetual Calendar; ID# 110715; Calibre: MB 29.15; 39mm in steel; MSRP $12,800
At 39mm it fit my wrist perfectly. And it was amazingly legible; I really could read all of the information without having to get out a magnifying glass, or staring at the watch intently. (At age 70 I'll let it go that I did need to have my glasses on.) Whoa! Crowded dial or no, that I might be able to own such a fascinating complication caused me to find the nearest unpopulated boarding area, get out my laptop, and search for the post.
Oh no! Sold! just a week or so before!
In the ~two years since that time I've looked at a lot of perpetual calendars. I love them. But I don't presently own one. I realize the Montblanc didn't show the year, and that, for me, is a pretty big omission. It's slightly limiting in its lean toward the dressy side. (As I'm retired I just don't have occasion to wear dressy pieces so often.) Yet, with the right strap it seemed—if not a daily wearer—at least plausible even with jeans. Perhaps one day I'll find the right one (and be able to afford it when I do). At the moment the UN Perpetual Ludwig fascinates me due to its older reference to style, and its movement, which allows setting both backward and forward. And I seem to remember seeing a perpetual that showed the year on the back. (Anyone care to chime in on that reference?) I loved that. Perhaps where I'm going with this is a "show me your perpetual and tell me why you love it" post. In any event, thank you, C. for sending the three posts of yours that highlight the perpetual that you have loved so well. Great reading/viewing. Have a good weekend! FH