marcello pisani
513
the case has been certainly ...
produced in 1957.
by the way not all watches in that period has the production time of the back punched inside.
if you see for ex. the date " III-57 " : this is related to the time in which the back has been produced and not to the case production time.
Advice please on this Bullseye 6532...........
A good friend has a 6532 which he has offered to sell me, as he knows that I am looking at getting a birth year watch. From the serial number 326*** we believe that it is from 1957. Though he will confirm it once he has had the back case removed. He has o...
woww .. really terrific pictures
I can just say that I " think " the dial is original and not reprinted so I can't take any responsability ... ( please ask the seller for better pics with hands positioned at 3 and 9, to have all writings " uncovered " ). the case in the 326.000 range has...
Thank you Marcello for your valued input....
I appreciate that the photos are pretty naff. But you have filled me with lots of confidence. I shall try and get some further photos. I spoke with my friend today and he took the watch to his watch dealer/repairer who took the back of and things looked g...
the case has been certainly ...
produced in 1957. by the way not all watches in that period has the production time of the back punched inside. if you see for ex. the date " III-57 " : this is related to the time in which the back has been produced and not to the case production time.
Thank you................
I shall ask him, if he thought to take any photos while the back was off.
Another...
One I sold a couple of years ago (please excuse the background!) The watch was powered with the calibre 1030, again model ref. 6352 and case no. 326***. The case back date code was Your friend will of course be able to source a genuine Rolex strap and b...
yep .. the 6352 has in fact ..
a big bubbleback movement ... and you can find it with or without the word EXPLORER on the dial : ...
Thank you to both Mike & Marcello.............
For the additional information & photos. My friend didn't think to take any photos while the cover was off. So he is going back to have it removed again so he can. One thing that he did notice, is that it didn't have a gasket around the inside of the ...