WatchProSite
|
Market
|
Digest
WatchProSite
|
Market
|
Digest
Market
Digest
About us
Moderator Team
Terms of conduct
Privacy Policy
Contact us
Patron Circle
Sponsorship/Advertising
Rolex
Search all forums
Only threads
With images
Reneo
212
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
not correct but looks COOL :)
Jul 12, 2011,00:08 AM -
3 comments
-
X
Reneo
login to reply
3 Comments
view entire thread
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Rolex Sub Date no cyclops
By: Giggs : July 11th, 2011-02:11
Guys, is this right? Saw it in a shop window. Any expert thoughts would help. David Rolex Sub Date 1680...
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
AFAIK, the 1680 only had a chimney plexy.
By: amanico : July 11th, 2011-03:38
The domed one is not correct for this reference. But the good plexy, with a bit of patience and hunt may be found. Best, Nicolas.
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
Thanks Nic...
By: Giggs : July 11th, 2011-06:44
always quick with the answers! Couldn't get a pic of the Seamaster in the end - it was gone when I went back...oh well, the search continues!
login to reply
Show profile
Show other posts
Send PM
not correct but looks COOL :)
By: Reneo : July 12th, 2011-00:08
Reneo
login to reply
Cancel
Options
Watermark images
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Gray
Light Gray
Display images as:
large images
normal images
small images
thumbnail images
Place caption text:
after images
before images
Done
Search
Done
Upload
Image Uploader
Click to pick or
drag images here