I am not disturbed by the thickness. I would prefer thinner and slightly thinner, but I like it as it is. [nt]

May 15, 2019,13:56 PM
 

No message body

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Tudor Black Bay GMT.

 
 By: amanico : May 14th, 2019-14:20
After having seen it in a Rolex Boutique, I could finally play with it. And to make a long story short, I am convinced! The watch is big, it is thick, indeed, but it has a cool factor and a lot of charm. And a detail I didn't notice till now is the silver...  

It’s a great watch...

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : May 14th, 2019-14:29
and I love them all ...  

And not forgetting...

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : May 14th, 2019-14:36
...  

I’m running out of options..

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : May 14th, 2019-14:51
...  

A fantastic Tudor. Better than any Super Case Rokex.

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : May 14th, 2019-23:32
No offence to proud Super Case owners, just my opinion.

😀 [nt]

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : May 15th, 2019-05:25

I had one a while ago just to see if its something for me .

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : May 14th, 2019-23:15
Like you said its big but not to big imo . Still it didnt give a smile on my face . But i def see why people like this watch

I passed on it

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : May 14th, 2019-23:35
Maybe in 39 mm it will be more convincing. I found it too thick, too big, not well proportioned to work as a big watch. Just my personal feelings.

too big?

 
 By: Peter : May 15th, 2019-13:23
i had the bracelet version and thought it is too big without giving it a real chance. sold it....:: )) then i had second thoughts and bought the nato version. bad idea, it looks even thicker on the nato.... then i put it on a watch gecko vintage highly st...  

It is the reason why a smaller size wouldn’t be a good idea

 
 By: foversta : May 15th, 2019-13:26
The diameter /thickness ratio would become too low. It is better imho with a 41mm size. Fx