amanico
[JLC Moderator]
400391
A bit thicker than a Sub
But a very nice toolwatch, like the Sub.
The visible difference is that you don't have a magnyfier for the date, on the SD.
A watch to use and abuse, without special restrictions, IMO.
But, if you already have a Sub, which may e your interest to go on a SD, which has such a close look ?
Best,
Nicolas
Sea Dweller?
Hi all, I am on the way to buing a new Rolex watch. Already I have SUB date which I regularly have been wearing for six years now. SUB is a great watch and still very accurate. When I visited a local Rolex seller I noticed that they still have got the dis...
A bit thicker than a Sub
But a very nice toolwatch, like the Sub. The visible difference is that you don't have a magnyfier for the date, on the SD. A watch to use and abuse, without special restrictions, IMO. But, if you already have a Sub, which may e your interest to go on a S...
Yes,
but what else? DeepSee is too big for me. GMT master, being almost more robust than the SUB? Yes, there is is another favourite: Exp 1. )
Since you own the Sub
I'd rather go on a different Rolex, like a GMT, Explo II or I ( but be careful ...Only 36mm, for the Explo I ). You will have a different watch, with a friendly complication, and with a nice look. Definitely, I'd go on one of these, rather than on a SD......
Seadweller ?
the Sub gets the most wrist time between the two. I think it is more comfortable to wear. Here is a picture (with a 1680 sub inbetween)...