Patek Philippe

We’ll know the Patek Philippe novelties in less than 3 weeks. As each year some certainly already know them, but I will ask them to respect embargo dates. Still as I have no idea and no information about what is coming I’m tempted to discuss. Do you want ...  

The Yellow Gold of the 5131J Clashes with the colors of the Cloissone, a Platinum case with blued hands to match the blue on the Cloissone on a dark blue strap would be more harmonious in my opinion. S This message has been edited by SALMANQ8 on 2011-02-2... 

No message body

Thanks for the pictures. This has reminded me again why despite high prices, waiting for what you want etc that I still love Patek. This is a thread I will be saving! Just sharing the joy with you all. Here is one my mine. Sorry for the quality of the pic...  

nt

thank you for this series of really superb pictures! i realized that watching pictures of PP watches has a soothing effect on my mind. clearly, something is wrong with me... regarding your question: i have no idea, but i'm sure the novelties of 2011 will ... 

nt

sure ! after the 5970 we will get the ...5971 would com to mind but that is the 5970 with diamonds. Well let's call it the 6970 I don't need an extre 5131 because they'll need 20 years to make all the watches which are ordered today. Firts deliver those A... 

forgot this one A SUPER complication WITH chrono. I mean something like a tourbillon, repeater, perpetual + chrono (now they finally have their manual inhouse chronograph) But this could take longe, I'm not expecting to see this happen in 2011, could be s... 

Hi, In fact they would have to create a brand new chrono to adopt a tourbillon and minute repeater on it. And that would mean to fill in a lot in Patek Philippe slim case! Who knows? Cheers Dje

another perpetual chrono.... Only I doubt it will be this year... Cheers

Hi, 6970? I don't think so, They are not ready for the 6 series with this one. We've seen the 5070, 5170, 5970..... I would bet for a 5X70! Cheers Dje This message has been edited by Dje on 2011-03-03 12:31:54

Yes it would be XXXX This message has been edited by Dje on 2011-03-21 03:35:48

Imho 2010 was THE patek year more than any other in the past, Incredible novelties! Especially the annual calendar, or the holy grails, split 5950 and repeater 5339, every of these set a new standard in their categroy imho. I don't see how Patek could mak... 

Well, 2010 was a great year but the 5207 was the most fascinating novelty for me in the last years. And the new chrono calibre of 2009 was the best base for years of joy (but indeed the 5170 was from 2010). The 5970 is a superb watch but a new watch with ... 

Thank you, Dje, for having shared so many thoughts and questions on the Patek Philippe's future collection. Let's our dreams run... 1. Stainless steel watches I'd like to see a contemporary remake of the ref. 3417 "Amagnetic". Do you remember my proposals...  

with the vintage dial.. fantastic best Imran

I must say that "fantastic" is the Patek Philippe aura, their tradition and their values. I hope my modest designs can convey my deep respect for the Manufacture. For now, I'm working on one of the ideas written in my previous message. Guess what!?!? I lo... 

Hi, Your proposals are intersting as innovative but I must confess I don't find them enough Patek Philippe! But some are quite interesting. Cheers Dje

Indeed, when I collect all the ideas and elements for a new design, I carefully and respectfully try to keep under control its "consistency" with the Patek Philippe style and tradition. If, sometimes, it creates the impression to dare too much, it's becau... 

a chrono or a steel 5980 with a composite strap option.

No message body

No message body

Not yet for 5726/1A

Has this been confirmed? Goh

i would love to see the 5170 in G perhaps in salmon? This message has been edited by a.ler on 2011-03-03 08:25:13...  

nt

The 3711 is probably the best nautilus that was ever made. A cheaper SS version I think would be amazing although it might devalue the demand for 3711.

No message body

No message body