SuitbertW
2411
Steve, afaik..
... untill now there wasn't a problem with 5980 yet - the reason perhaps beeing that those are already slightly modified (besides the fact it's also different movement without annual calendar plate).
As you'll see in this earlier post about the hands modification :
www.watchprosite.com
The new version seconds hand was from the first available 5980 - and as said I've yet to hear of a similar problem with 5980.
It's also my understanding that this problem doesn't come to any specific watch inevitably - there are many out there with no problems and I'm even not sure Borgogneboys problem has the same background (ok, that's more academic now, a problem is a problem.....
)
best
Suitbert
Steve, afaik..
By: SuitbertW : March 23rd, 2007-07:25
... untill now there wasn't a problem with 5980 yet - the reason perhaps beeing that those are already slightly modified (besides the fact it's also different movement without annual calendar plate). As you'll see in this earlier post about the hands modi...
Not even that....
By: SuitbertW : March 23rd, 2007-16:01
Hi, Steve, it's not that simple - to my knowledge the largest part of first version 5960 work reliably. One should note that the first symptom reportedly were tiny scratches to the tips of the minute hand - and only after those were returned after repair ...
Suibert,
By: Zane : March 24th, 2007-01:24
so should I send in my 5960 just to be safe or not all 5960 are problematic. I hate to see mine having any problem after the warranty. Should I play around with the chrono function as much as possible now then? What do you think? Cheers