SuitbertW
2411
Not even that....
Hi, Steve,
it's not that simple - to my
knowledge the largest part of first version 5960 work reliably.
One should
note that the first symptom reportedly were tiny scratches to the tips of the
minute hand - and only after those were returned after repair (assuming it
was a QC problem
and probably had left the factory with already scratched
minute hand) with the same symptoms
again it was more and more obvious the
symptom wasn't the actual problem.
The research was so difficult, cause the
largest part worked flawlessly - only few exhhibited
this
problem.
I'm sure PP will handle the whole with
best care, it'll most likely mean considerable patience for
those who own
problematic pieces - but at the end I'm sure they'll do their best to solve the
problem.
Best
Suitbert
Steve, afaik..
By: SuitbertW : March 23rd, 2007-07:25
... untill now there wasn't a problem with 5980 yet - the reason perhaps beeing that those are already slightly modified (besides the fact it's also different movement without annual calendar plate). As you'll see in this earlier post about the hands modi...
Not even that....
By: SuitbertW : March 23rd, 2007-16:01
Hi, Steve, it's not that simple - to my knowledge the largest part of first version 5960 work reliably. One should note that the first symptom reportedly were tiny scratches to the tips of the minute hand - and only after those were returned after repair ...
Suibert,
By: Zane : March 24th, 2007-01:24
so should I send in my 5960 just to be safe or not all 5960 are problematic. I hate to see mine having any problem after the warranty. Should I play around with the chrono function as much as possible now then? What do you think? Cheers