Patek Philippe

...  

......do you know the reputation of the owner....does it have its papers......etc etc But from teh scan, it looks lovely. Probably a 2nd series 3417.........can't be 100% without seeing it though

My only fear is that it is too small for me on the long run.

Well, depending on the wrist and outfit it should look great! I'd only change the strap to a black one. 😉

......i have an Explorer 1 that is actually bigger by 1mm but appears much smaller. The 3417 wears on the larger side........

Best wishes Alkiro

I propose the special 3417 guide of mstanga.

just contact him via email, nice guy received my book within very short time 👏

Best, Ahmed

The ref 3417 is a most magnificent model J

and about the size, it's a proper size IMHO. hope you pull the trigger cheers

Hi everybody, today I was in Parma and I've seen this watch in the real (finally because I saw it only by pic before) I used a good loupe and analyzed the dial. It is my opinion that there are not signs to let me think it is repainted or refinished. It ha...  

LoL. I have been discussing this watch with a friend. I saw a similar dilemma. Much to suggest a type 1 but also elements of a type 2. If I had to jump, I would say Mk1 variant as that would conform more to the serial and movement number. But 60% only pro... 

Movement number: 730.11x (cal. 27AM400) Case number: 2.618.17x They are coherent for a type 1 dial The dealer has a Patek Extract from the archives

Thx for teaching us on this one.