Tony C.
1239
ref. 3425, cal. 27–460, but with no second hands?
I happened to see one for sale (with an Archive Extract), and wonder just how rarely PP produced automatics without second hand functions? Presumably it was to satisfy the classic, minimalist tastes of some of their customers. Can anyone shed some light on the relative production numbers of those cal. 27–460 with and without second hands?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Tony C.
More posts:
ref. 3425, cal. 27–460, but with no second hands?
I happened to see one for sale (with an Archive Extract), and wonder just how rarely PP produced automatics without second hand functions? Presumably it was to satisfy the classic, minimalist tastes of some of their customers. Can anyone shed some light o...
Be carefull.....
Hi Tony, personally I don't know of any original 3425 without small seconds - although that alone doesn't mean very much ;-) The extract can be ordered by case and movement number and most likely doesn't specify this detail - so that's no proof of origina...
Patek 3425 without second hand
Hi, I bought one 3425 with Beyer double sign, which is without second hand. Patek issued extract of archive based on my photos incl. dial. I even remind them it’s without second hand. I tried to search on the web and found your post. It has been very long...
not mentioned on archive
No. It only mention dial is “3425”. I asked PP service center to consult with their Geneva Headquaters why there is only 2 hands. They think it’s possible but they can’t mention on the archive.
3425 without second hand
Hi, I bought one 3425 with Beyer double sign, which is without second hand. Patek issued extract of archive based on my photos incl. dial. I even remind them it’s without second hand. I tried to search on the web and found your post. It has been very long...
