dr.kol
11333
Now the wrong guy is answering:
Get it!
There has been a lot of discussion why Patek discontinued this reference and introduced 5712. One of the theories is that 3712 was too expensive to produce. My engineer friends have confirmed that the case of 5712 is much simpler to produce with modern machinery.
My reasoning why I bought 3712 and not 5712 was simple: I had to pay much more for 3712 but I took it because it is constructed according to the original design of Gerald Genta.
Some people have selected 3712 because it is so rare. There are not really many around and if I remember correctly, this reference was produced just for some 9 months.
So if you can, get it. I will never sell mine and I enjoy it a lot every time I'm wearing it.
Best, Kari
Available on the marketplace
2,850 Patek Philippe listings are live on the eBay market and 1721 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
Thanks tic-toc
By: dr.kol : September 18th, 2012-22:43
Indeed a WG simple Nautilus is a rare bird. Another issue is how interested people are in sporting watches made of gold. I.e. a vintage Rolex Submariner can cost a lot but a Submariner made of gold with golden bracelet from the same year can be a bargain....
With pleasure.
By: dr.kol : September 18th, 2012-23:23
The two part case requires much more work than the traditional three-part-case. It might be a rumor but what I have heard the decision to discontinue came after a remark of Patek's management "3712 is not economical to produce". Best, Kari
however ....
By: jellybean : September 19th, 2012-02:08
..... i now have a question for you Mr. Kari. The older Nautilus ie 3712, 3800, 3700, even 3711, werent they all made in two part cases also ?? As you mentioned three part cases, which is the third part ?? There is the bezel attached to the lugs, and then...
Review ...
By: jellybean : September 19th, 2012-08:52
Quoted earlier : The two part case requires much more work than the traditional three-part-case. In other words, in your earlier statement, the older models were harder to make than the current production ... ?? because you mentioned traditional, i assume...
I guess so but
By: dr.kol : September 19th, 2012-09:01
I don't know. I'm an economist and do not understand anything about producing anything. However, I showed the original pictures to a friend of mine who holds Ph.D. in engineering. He stated without hesitation that from the production perspective the older...