Which is not very good, what you describe is acceptable in my opinion. Most brand do not return parts from service. This is to avoid feeding the Franken watch market. Only Longines return parts from my Dad’s vintage model. The fact that the bracelet was u
Once you travel down the Patek Nautilus path it is hard to resist all the treasures. The question is try to keep the harmony and avoid the duplications. Enjoy. Patek Philippe 5712/1A-001 Patek Nautilus at anchor.
Hi guys. I’m looking to add a formal dress watch in my collection. At present I have the 5205g as the only so called dress watch. The rest are sports or otherwise being the 5711r 5712 5960 g and steel . Was shortlisting the 5205r and the 5396r. Wanted a g
Must have to agree that each watch has its own merits. I tried to summarize as below (plus my own thoughts) and there are surely no clear answers as to which one is better. I think Patek does that on purpose catering to different types of collectors which
I love slimmer watches and when trying the 5726, I felt it was too bulky. One of the selling points and characteristic of the Nautilus is that it is a wearable slim sports watch. The 5711, the 5712 and the 5740 epitomises this but the 5990 and 5726 do not
15 years already. That makes a good part of a life, doesn't it? 15 years of pleasure, with good and bad moments, shared in a private way. This 5110P is one of my most significant horological experience. A dream which became reality. You know the feeling,
Looking to add pp5167 to my collection. I m thinking about bracelet version can someone kindly offer any opinion whether to get rubber or bracelet version ? I have the 5980 and 5712,,,and looking for a daily Patek 5167. thx in advance
According to my observation: Lemania base in 5970s is better finished than the one in the early 3970s. Lemania base in late 5070 is on par with in 5970. (finish quality 5070P=5970P) 240 in 5712 is better finished than in 5110/3940/5026. 324 in 5167 is bet