sham1
9619
Not bad a selection
And as usual we differ on our selection but still I like quite a few of your choices even though they are all a tad too large for me.
Very nice Joe!
By: sham1 : May 12th, 2017-01:20
Well taken for photos of a beautifully preserved watch! So tell me then, which are the six Pateks in the current collection you would like to own? I am personally partial to the 5959,5950,7000R and 5078G all of which unfortunately are quite unaffordable e...
Here are a few :-)
By: sham1 : May 12th, 2017-03:57
38.8mm and a good fit 36mm and the best fit ever on my wrist with the wrap around bracelet 39.4mm but the lugs do stick out a little which is a deal breaker for me. Lovely watch though 37mm and locked in my AD safe awaiting my paying it off over a 11 year...
WOW ! What a selection !
By: Mike H : May 12th, 2017-04:48
BTW I think your WG perpetual calendar (not the 5940 but the other one) is a 5140 and not 3940, so it should be 37.2 mm if I don't mistake (only the 3940 is 36 mm). Really wonderful collection you have here, and they all look great on your wrist ! Wear th...
Sorry Mike but
By: sham1 : May 12th, 2017-04:59
The bracelet Patek is a 5136G and is 36mm (measured at the Patek Salon) and is smaller than the 5140 range. The 5136G lived during the time of the 3940 and a little during the 5140. It was a cross section of the two in that it measured 36mm but had the nu...
Thanks Mike!
By: sham1 : May 12th, 2017-06:18
I was quite surprised how much better the 36mm 5136G fitted my wrist compared to a 5140. And as I do not trust my own judgement at times, I tend to get whoever is assisting me at the Patek Salon to confirm that my eyes are still working
I agree with you Joe
By: Mark in Paris : May 13th, 2017-04:13
Patek Philippe has shown over the decades that it has followed a unique direction, respecting evolutions, sometimes surprises that we take today for something normal but which make what the brand is today. As usual, it isn't possible to please everybody, ...